PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIEM vs. PEMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DIEM vs. PEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM) and Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (PEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIEM achieves a 32.78% return, which is significantly lower than PEMX's 41.25% return.


DIEM

1D
-1.37%
1M
12.08%
YTD
32.78%
6M
35.57%
1Y
60.54%
3Y*
28.35%
5Y*
11.49%
10Y*

PEMX

1D
0.39%
1M
12.53%
YTD
41.25%
6M
46.76%
1Y
76.56%
3Y*
35.01%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIEM vs. PEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DIEM
Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
32.78%30.81%12.29%9.14%
PEMX
Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF
41.25%34.01%17.21%15.13%

Correlation

The correlation between DIEM and PEMX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2023

0.83

The correlation between DIEM and PEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

DIEM vs. PEMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DIEM
PEMX

Technology

40.3%
45.0%

Financial Services

23.3%
24.4%

Consumer Cyclical

6.7%
4.2%

Energy

6.0%

-

Communication Services

5.6%
6.6%

Industrials

4.7%
8.6%

Basic Materials

4.2%
2.8%

Utilities

4.1%
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
1.2%

Real Estate

1.6%
0.9%

Healthcare

0.6%
1.9%

Technology

DIEM
40.3%
PEMX
45.0%

Financial Services

DIEM
23.3%
PEMX
24.4%

Consumer Cyclical

DIEM
6.7%
PEMX
4.2%

Energy

DIEM
6.0%
PEMX

-

Communication Services

DIEM
5.6%
PEMX
6.6%

Industrials

DIEM
4.7%
PEMX
8.6%

Basic Materials

DIEM
4.2%
PEMX
2.8%

Utilities

DIEM
4.1%
PEMX
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

DIEM
2.9%
PEMX
1.2%

Real Estate

DIEM
1.6%
PEMX
0.9%

Healthcare

DIEM
0.6%
PEMX
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DIEM vs. PEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIEM
DIEM Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
DIEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIEM Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
DIEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

PEMX
PEMX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
PEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
PEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIEM vs. PEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM) and Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (PEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DIEMPEMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.35

3.58

-0.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.26

4.36

-0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.61

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.93

5.39

-0.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

20.34

21.27

-0.94

DIEM vs. PEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIEM Sharpe Ratio is 3.35, which is comparable to the PEMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIEM and PEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DIEMPEMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.35

3.58

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

2.00

-1.46

Drawdowns

DIEM vs. PEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIEM drawdown since its inception was -38.61%, which is greater than PEMX's maximum drawdown of -14.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIEM and PEMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DIEMPEMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.61%

-14.91%

-23.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.33%

-14.45%

+2.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.82%

-14.91%

-1.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.37%

0.00%

-1.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.72%

-2.85%

-6.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

3.66%

-0.67%

Volatility

DIEM vs. PEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM) is 8.52%, while Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (PEMX) has a volatility of 9.60%. This indicates that DIEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DIEMPEMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.52%

9.60%

-1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.91%

18.74%

-2.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.17%

21.49%

-3.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.93%

18.19%

-1.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.59%

18.19%

-0.60%

DIEM vs. PEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIEM has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than PEMX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

DIEM vs. PEMX - Dividend Comparison

DIEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, less than PEMX's 4.96% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DIEM
Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
2.30%2.99%4.92%4.45%6.31%4.06%2.75%5.98%3.87%2.61%0.35%
PEMX
Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF
4.96%7.00%5.00%0.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, DIEM and PEMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PEMX has higher volatility (9.60%) compared to DIEM (8.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIEM dropped -38.61% vs PEMX's -14.91%.

On 3-year performance, PEMX leads with 35.01% vs 28.35% for DIEM. On fees, DIEM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, DIEM has been the lower-risk option at 8.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, PEMX has performed better with a 35.01% return vs 28.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIEM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for PEMX.

PEMX has the higher dividend yield at 4.96%, compared with 2.30% for DIEM.

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Putnam. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for DIEM and 0.85% for PEMX.

PEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.58 vs 3.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DIEM and PEMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer