PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIDIY vs. KWEB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DIDIY vs. KWEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Didi Global Inc ADR (DIDIY) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIDIY achieves a -31.44% return, which is significantly lower than KWEB's -20.06% return.


DIDIY

1D
-5.47%
1M
-0.96%
YTD
-31.44%
6M
-37.04%
1Y
-21.30%
3Y*
9.07%
5Y*
10Y*

KWEB

1D
-3.92%
1M
-4.79%
YTD
-20.06%
6M
-22.24%
1Y
-12.78%
3Y*
4.05%
5Y*
-14.28%
10Y*
0.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIDIY vs. KWEB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DIDIY
Didi Global Inc ADR
-31.44%15.54%15.70%24.21%-13.35%
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
-20.06%23.55%12.01%-9.06%0.94%

Correlation

The correlation between DIDIY and KWEB is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2022

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DIDIY vs. KWEB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIDIY
DIDIY Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
DIDIY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIDIY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIDIY Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
DIDIY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIDIY Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

KWEB
KWEB Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
KWEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KWEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
KWEB Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
KWEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
KWEB Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIDIY vs. KWEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Didi Global Inc ADR (DIDIY) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DIDIYKWEBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.44

-0.47

+0.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.35

-0.52

+0.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

0.94

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.42

-0.38

-0.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.76

-0.76

0.00

DIDIY vs. KWEB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIDIY Sharpe Ratio is -0.44, which is comparable to the KWEB Sharpe Ratio of -0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIDIY and KWEB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DIDIYKWEBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.44

-0.47

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.01

0.06

-0.07

Drawdowns

DIDIY vs. KWEB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIDIY drawdown since its inception was -51.08%, smaller than the maximum KWEB drawdown of -80.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIDIY and KWEB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DIDIYKWEBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.08%

-80.92%

+29.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.08%

-34.13%

-16.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.08%

-34.13%

-16.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.06%

-68.52%

+20.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.28%

-35.24%

+14.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.09%

16.85%

+11.24%

Volatility

DIDIY vs. KWEB - Volatility Comparison

Didi Global Inc ADR (DIDIY) has a higher volatility of 15.44% compared to KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) at 11.52%. This indicates that DIDIY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KWEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DIDIYKWEBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.44%

11.52%

+3.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.44%

20.11%

+10.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.91%

27.25%

+21.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.49%

47.67%

+3.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.49%

39.99%

+11.50%

Dividends

DIDIY vs. KWEB - Dividend Comparison

DIDIY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KWEB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.70%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DIDIY
Didi Global Inc ADR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
7.70%6.16%3.51%1.71%0.00%7.07%0.29%0.08%3.40%0.58%1.19%0.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


DIDIY and KWEB have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIDIY has higher volatility (15.44%) compared to KWEB (11.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIDIY dropped -51.08% vs KWEB's -80.92%.

DIDIY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.44 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DIDIY and KWEB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer