DIAL vs. TMSF
DIAL (Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF) and TMSF (T. Rowe Price Multi-Sector Income ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. DIAL is passively managed, while TMSF is actively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DIAL charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.37%/yr for TMSF.
Performance
DIAL vs. TMSF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIAL achieves a 0.88% return, which is significantly lower than TMSF's 1.71% return.
DIAL
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 0.88%
- 6M
- 0.93%
- 1Y
- 6.65%
- 3Y*
- 5.85%
- 5Y*
- 0.73%
- 10Y*
- —
TMSF
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 1.71%
- 6M
- 2.23%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIAL vs. TMSF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DIAL Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF | 0.88% | 1.01% |
TMSF T. Rowe Price Multi-Sector Income ETF | 1.71% | 1.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIAL and TMSF is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIAL vs. TMSF — Risk / Return Rank
DIAL
TMSF
DIAL vs. TMSF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF (DIAL) and T. Rowe Price Multi-Sector Income ETF (TMSF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DIAL | TMSF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.00 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.79 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DIAL | TMSF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 1.99 | -1.64 |
Drawdowns
DIAL vs. TMSF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIAL drawdown since its inception was -22.19%, which is greater than TMSF's maximum drawdown of -2.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIAL and TMSF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIAL | TMSF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.19% | -2.28% | -19.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.01% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.88% | -0.25% | -0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.54% | -0.38% | -5.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.86% | — | — |
Volatility
DIAL vs. TMSF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIAL | TMSF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.57% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.23% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.08% | 2.94% | +1.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.03% | 2.94% | +4.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.03% | 2.94% | +4.09% |
DIAL vs. TMSF - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIAL has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than TMSF's 0.37% expense ratio.
Dividends
DIAL vs. TMSF - Dividend Comparison
DIAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%, more than TMSF's 3.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIAL Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF | 5.05% | 4.81% | 4.67% | 3.77% | 3.47% | 2.46% | 2.61% | 3.27% | 3.56% | 0.65% |
TMSF T. Rowe Price Multi-Sector Income ETF | 3.06% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIAL and TMSF have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DIAL is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DIAL is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for TMSF.
DIAL has the higher dividend yield at 5.05%, compared with 3.06% for TMSF.
They also come from different issuers: Ameriprise Financial and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for DIAL and 0.37% for TMSF.
Find the right allocation for DIAL and TMSF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer