PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIA vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DIA vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIA achieves a 8.61% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 11.48% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DIA having a 12.96% annualized return and DGRO not far ahead at 13.13%.


DIA

1D
-0.55%
1M
0.50%
6M
5.75%
YTD
8.61%
1Y
18.61%
3Y*
15.60%
5Y*
10.19%
10Y*
12.96%
ALL TIME*
9.13%

DGRO

1D
-0.58%
1M
2.50%
6M
8.20%
YTD
11.48%
1Y
20.92%
3Y*
15.71%
5Y*
10.91%
10Y*
13.13%
ALL TIME*
12.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIA vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DIA
State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust
8.61%14.71%14.82%16.02%-7.02%20.83%9.59%24.70%-3.74%28.08%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
11.48%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%9.50%29.87%-2.38%23.00%

Correlation

The correlation between DIA and DGRO is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2014

0.94

The correlation between DIA and DGRO shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (1 year) to 0.94 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DIA vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DIA
DGRO

Financial Services

26.7%
20.4%

Industrials

18.9%
11.3%

Technology

16.1%
17.3%

Healthcare

13.2%
17.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
6.5%

Communication Services

5.2%
0.1%

Basic Materials

3.9%
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
11.9%

Energy

1.9%
4.8%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

7.3%

Financial Services

DIA
26.7%
DGRO
20.4%

Industrials

DIA
18.9%
DGRO
11.3%

Technology

DIA
16.1%
DGRO
17.3%

Healthcare

DIA
13.2%
DGRO
17.9%

Consumer Cyclical

DIA
10.3%
DGRO
6.5%

Communication Services

DIA
5.2%
DGRO
0.1%

Basic Materials

DIA
3.9%
DGRO
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

DIA
3.9%
DGRO
11.9%

Energy

DIA
1.9%
DGRO
4.8%

Real Estate

DIA

-

DGRO

-

Utilities

DIA

-

DGRO
7.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DIA vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIA
DIA Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
DIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
DIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIA Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIA vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DIADGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.40

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

3.25

-1.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.39

12.53

-5.14

DIA vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIA Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is lower than the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIA and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DIA vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIA drawdown since its inception was -51.87%, which is greater than DGRO's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIA and DGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DIADGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.87%

-35.10%

-16.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.76%

-6.47%

-3.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.95%

-14.03%

-1.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.76%

-19.31%

-1.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.70%

-35.10%

-1.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.26%

-1.17%

-1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.11%

-3.41%

-3.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

1.67%

+0.86%

Volatility

DIA vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) is 2.21%, while iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) has a volatility of 2.73%. This indicates that DIA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DIADGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.21%

2.73%

-0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.66%

7.14%

+2.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.27%

9.56%

+2.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.78%

13.78%

+1.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.51%

16.58%

+0.93%

DIA vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIA has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DIA vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

DIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, less than DGRO's 1.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.93%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
DIA
State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust
1.39%1.43%1.61%1.81%1.91%1.58%1.87%1.85%2.24%1.97%2.26%2.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


DIA and DGRO have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGRO has higher volatility (2.73%) compared to DIA (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIA dropped -51.87% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

On 10-year performance, DGRO leads with 13.13% vs 12.96% for DIA. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DIA has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 13.13% return vs 12.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for DIA.

DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 1.39% for DIA.

DIA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. DIA tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for DIA and 0.08% for DGRO.

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DIA and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer