DIA vs. BDGS

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DIA (State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust) and BDGS (Bridges Capital Tactical ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. DIA is passively managed, while BDGS is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DIA returned 17.21%/yr vs 13.42%/yr for BDGS. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DIA charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for BDGS.

Performance

DIA vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIA achieves a 8.31% return, which is significantly higher than BDGS's 4.21% return.

DIA

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 2.35%
• YTD: 8.31%
• 6M: 7.49%
• 1Y: 23.20%
• 3Y*: 17.21%
• 5Y*: 10.52%
• 10Y*: 13.69%

BDGS

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -1.13%
• YTD: 4.21%
• 6M: 3.97%
• 1Y: 11.63%
• 3Y*: 13.42%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIA vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DIA State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust	8.31%	14.71%	14.82%	13.93%
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	4.21%	10.61%	19.07%	8.23%

Correlation

The correlation between DIA and BDGS is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2023	0.59

The correlation between DIA and BDGS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

DIA vs. BDGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DIA	BDGS
Financial Services	27.3%	9.3%
Technology	19.1%	37.4%
Industrials	18.1%	6.6%
Healthcare	12.8%	7.5%
Consumer Cyclical	11.0%	10.9%
Consumer Defensive	4.1%	4.1%
Basic Materials	3.7%	1.5%
Energy	2.2%	2.6%
Communication Services	1.8%	16.6%
Real Estate	-	1.5%
Utilities	-	1.9%

Return for Risk

DIA vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIA

DIA Risk / Return Rank: 56
DIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
DIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
DIA Omega Ratio Rank: 55
DIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
DIA Martin Ratio Rank: 54

BDGS

BDGS Risk / Return Rank: 62
BDGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
BDGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
BDGS Omega Ratio Rank: 64
BDGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
BDGS Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIA vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DIA	BDGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.88	1.84	+0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.74	2.75	-0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.37	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.39	2.90	-0.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.22	12.72	-3.50

DIA vs. BDGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIA Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the BDGS Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIA and BDGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DIA vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIA drawdown since its inception was -51.87%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIA and BDGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	DIA	BDGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.87%	-9.12%	-42.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.76%	-4.03%	-5.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.95%	-9.12%	-6.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.76%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.65%	-2.17%	+1.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.13%	-0.66%	-6.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.52%	0.92%	+1.60%

Volatility

DIA vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) has a higher volatility of 4.15% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 2.30%. This indicates that DIA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DIA	BDGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.15%	2.30%	+1.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.76%	5.17%	+4.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.42%	6.38%	+6.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.84%	8.22%	+6.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.53%	8.22%	+9.31%

DIA vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIA has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.87% expense ratio.

Dividends

DIA vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

DIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, more than BDGS's 0.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	0.53%	0.55%	1.81%	0.84%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DIA State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust	1.40%	1.43%	1.61%	1.81%	1.91%	1.58%	1.87%	1.85%	2.24%	1.97%	2.26%	2.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DIA and BDGS in my portfolio?

DIA and BDGS have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DIA or BDGS?

DIA has higher volatility (4.15%) compared to BDGS (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIA dropped -51.87% vs BDGS's -9.12%.

Which ETF is better, DIA or BDGS?

On 3-year performance, DIA leads with 17.21% vs 13.42% for BDGS. On fees, DIA is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, BDGS has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DIA or BDGS?

Over the 3-year period, DIA has performed better with a 17.21% return vs 13.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DIA or BDGS?

DIA is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for BDGS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DIA or BDGS?

DIA has the higher dividend yield at 1.40%, compared with 0.53% for BDGS.

What is the main difference between DIA and BDGS?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Bridges. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for DIA and 0.87% for BDGS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DIA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.