DHS vs. INCE
DHS (WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund) and INCE (Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DHS is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. High Dividend Index, while INCE is a Dividend fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. DHS is passively managed, while INCE is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DHS returned 12.40%/yr vs 10.49%/yr for INCE. Their 0.72 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. DHS charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for INCE.
Performance
DHS vs. INCE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DHS achieves a 17.07% return, which is significantly higher than INCE's 14.91% return.
DHS
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 1.94%
- 6M
- 9.42%
- YTD
- 17.07%
- 1Y
- 25.65%
- 3Y*
- 17.11%
- 5Y*
- 12.40%
- 10Y*
- 9.67%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.26%
INCE
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- 6M
- 7.74%
- YTD
- 14.91%
- 1Y
- 26.00%
- 3Y*
- 15.52%
- 5Y*
- 10.49%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.06%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.47M | $3.71M | $2.99M | |
| $621.36K | $657.47K | $945.62K |
DHS vs. INCE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHS WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund | 17.07% | 12.87% | 18.02% | -0.19% | 7.97% | 23.20% | -5.70% | 22.59% | -7.41% | 11.69% |
INCE Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF | 14.91% | 15.92% | 10.70% | 13.87% | -8.54% | 23.36% | 12.33% | 32.72% | -2.14% | 19.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between DHS and INCE is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2016 | 0.72 |
The correlation between DHS and INCE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
DHS vs. INCE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DHS
INCE
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Energy
Communication Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Financial Services
DHS
INCE
Healthcare
DHS
INCE
Consumer Defensive
DHS
INCE
Utilities
DHS
INCE
Energy
DHS
INCE
Communication Services
DHS
INCE
Technology
DHS
INCE
Consumer Cyclical
DHS
INCE
Industrials
DHS
INCE
Real Estate
DHS
INCE
-
Basic Materials
DHS
INCE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DHS vs. INCE — Risk / Return Rank
DHS
INCE
DHS vs. INCE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) and Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DHS | INCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.58 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.09 | 5.24 | -1.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.00 | 20.20 | -5.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DHS vs. INCE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DHS drawdown since its inception was -67.25%, which is greater than INCE's maximum drawdown of -33.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHS and INCE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DHS | INCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.25% | -33.95% | -33.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.30% | -4.90% | -1.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.87% | -14.01% | +2.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.28% | -18.40% | +3.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.89% | -0.16% | -1.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.48% | -3.22% | -6.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.71% | 1.27% | +0.44% |
Volatility
DHS vs. INCE - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) has a higher volatility of 3.77% compared to Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE) at 2.46%. This indicates that DHS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INCE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DHS | INCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.77% | 2.46% | +1.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.84% | 6.15% | +1.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.40% | 8.40% | +2.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.91% | 13.25% | +0.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.10% | 15.60% | +0.50% |
DHS vs. INCE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DHS has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than INCE's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
DHS vs. INCE - Dividend Comparison
DHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, less than INCE's 4.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHS WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund | 3.18% | 3.32% | 3.66% | 4.31% | 3.42% | 3.29% | 4.14% | 3.69% | 3.76% | 3.00% | 3.25% | 3.53% |
INCE Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF | 4.84% | 4.71% | 3.25% | 1.75% | 1.68% | 1.41% | 1.40% | 1.31% | 1.55% | 1.44% | 0.50% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DHS and INCE have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DHS has higher volatility (3.77%) compared to INCE (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DHS dropped -67.25% vs INCE's -33.95%.
On 5-year performance, DHS leads with 12.40% vs 10.49% for INCE. On fees, INCE is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, INCE has been the lower-risk option at 2.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DHS has performed better with a 12.40% return vs 10.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
INCE is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for DHS.
INCE has the higher dividend yield at 4.84%, compared with 3.18% for DHS.
DHS is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while INCE is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for DHS and 0.29% for INCE.
INCE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DHS and INCE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer