DHS vs. GDMN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DHS (WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund) and GDMN (WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - DHS is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. High Dividend Index, while GDMN is a Commodities fund actively managed by WisdomTree. DHS is passively managed, while GDMN is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DHS returned 16.39%/yr vs 60.95%/yr for GDMN. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DHS charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for GDMN.

Performance

DHS vs. GDMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DHS achieves a 9.88% return, which is significantly higher than GDMN's -4.13% return.

DHS

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: -0.16%
• YTD: 9.88%
• 6M: 10.38%
• 1Y: 20.55%
• 3Y*: 16.39%
• 5Y*: 10.59%
• 10Y*: 9.47%

GDMN

• 1D: -3.68%
• 1M: -2.43%
• YTD: -4.13%
• 6M: 2.73%
• 1Y: 76.93%
• 3Y*: 60.95%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DHS vs. GDMN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DHS WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund	9.88%	12.87%	18.02%	-0.19%	7.97%	1.07%
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund	-4.13%	237.09%	28.23%	12.97%	-14.62%	5.11%

Correlation

The correlation between DHS and GDMN is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2021	0.23

The correlation between DHS and GDMN shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DHS vs. GDMN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DHS	GDMN
Financial Services	22.3%	-
Consumer Defensive	18.7%	-
Healthcare	14.5%	-
Energy	9.4%	-
Communication Services	9.3%	-
Utilities	9.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	5.0%	-
Industrials	4.1%	-
Technology	3.7%	-
Real Estate	2.8%	-
Basic Materials	1.2%	100.0%

Return for Risk

DHS vs. GDMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DHS

DHS Risk / Return Rank: 62
DHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
DHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
DHS Omega Ratio Rank: 57
DHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
DHS Martin Ratio Rank: 65

GDMN

GDMN Risk / Return Rank: 34
GDMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
GDMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
GDMN Omega Ratio Rank: 36
GDMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
GDMN Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DHS vs. GDMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DHS	GDMN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.06	1.26	+0.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.09	1.68	+1.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.25	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.28	1.98	+1.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.04	4.68	+7.37
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DHS vs. GDMN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DHS Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is higher than the GDMN Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DHS and GDMN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DHS	GDMN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.06	1.26	+0.80
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.80	-0.40

Drawdowns

DHS vs. GDMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DHS drawdown since its inception was -67.25%, which is greater than GDMN's maximum drawdown of -52.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHS and GDMN.

Drawdown Indicators

	DHS	GDMN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.25%	-52.82%	-14.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.30%	-39.03%	+32.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.87%	-39.03%	+27.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.28%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.35%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.60%	-37.06%	+34.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.55%	-18.89%	+9.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.71%	16.51%	-14.80%

Volatility

DHS vs. GDMN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) is 2.88%, while WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) has a volatility of 17.94%. This indicates that DHS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DHS	GDMN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.88%	17.94%	-15.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.32%	51.79%	-44.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.01%	61.32%	-51.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.89%	47.59%	-33.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.08%	47.59%	-31.51%

DHS vs. GDMN - Expense Ratio Comparison

DHS has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than GDMN's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

DHS vs. GDMN - Dividend Comparison

DHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, more than GDMN's 2.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DHS WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund	3.35%	3.32%	3.66%	4.31%	3.42%	3.29%	4.14%	3.69%	3.76%	3.00%	3.25%	3.53%
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund	2.82%	2.70%	9.44%	7.69%	1.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DHS and GDMN in my portfolio?

DHS and GDMN have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DHS or GDMN?

GDMN has higher volatility (17.94%) compared to DHS (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DHS dropped -67.25% vs GDMN's -52.82%.

Which ETF is better, DHS or GDMN?

On 3-year performance, GDMN leads with 60.95% vs 16.39% for DHS. On fees, DHS is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, DHS has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DHS or GDMN?

Over the 3-year period, GDMN has performed better with a 60.95% return vs 16.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DHS or GDMN?

DHS is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GDMN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DHS or GDMN?

DHS has the higher dividend yield at 3.35%, compared with 2.82% for GDMN.

What is the main difference between DHS and GDMN?

DHS is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while GDMN is Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for DHS and 0.45% for GDMN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DHS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.