DHS vs. GDMN
Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN).
DHS and GDMN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DHS is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the WisdomTree U.S. High Dividend Index. It was launched on Jun 16, 2006. GDMN is an actively managed fund by WisdomTree. It was launched on Dec 16, 2021.
Performance
DHS vs. GDMN - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DHS vs. GDMN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHS WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund | 8.00% | 12.87% | 18.02% | -0.19% | 7.97% | 1.07% |
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund | 8.77% | 237.09% | 28.23% | 12.97% | -14.62% | 5.11% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DHS achieves a 8.00% return, which is significantly lower than GDMN's 8.77% return.
DHS
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- -2.77%
- YTD
- 8.00%
- 6M
- 10.21%
- 1Y
- 14.07%
- 3Y*
- 14.13%
- 5Y*
- 11.42%
- 10Y*
- 9.56%
GDMN
- 1D
- 9.38%
- 1M
- -27.72%
- YTD
- 8.77%
- 6M
- 31.63%
- 1Y
- 140.14%
- 3Y*
- 65.41%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DHS vs. GDMN - Expense Ratio Comparison
DHS has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than GDMN's 0.45% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DHS vs. GDMN — Risk / Return Rank
DHS
GDMN
DHS vs. GDMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DHS | GDMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.06 | 2.20 | -1.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.49 | 2.34 | -0.84 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.35 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.34 | 3.69 | -2.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.00 | 12.63 | -7.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DHS | GDMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 2.20 | -1.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.94 | -0.54 |
Correlation
The correlation between DHS and GDMN is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
DHS vs. GDMN - Dividend Comparison
DHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, more than GDMN's 2.48% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHS WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund | 3.23% | 3.32% | 3.66% | 4.31% | 3.42% | 3.29% | 4.14% | 3.69% | 3.76% | 3.00% | 3.25% | 3.53% |
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund | 2.48% | 2.70% | 9.44% | 7.69% | 1.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
DHS vs. GDMN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DHS drawdown since its inception was -67.25%, which is greater than GDMN's maximum drawdown of -52.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHS and GDMN.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DHS | GDMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.25% | -52.82% | -14.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.84% | -39.03% | +28.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.23% | -28.60% | +25.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.62% | -18.45% | +8.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.10% | 11.39% | -8.29% |
Volatility
DHS vs. GDMN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) is 3.13%, while WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) has a volatility of 24.97%. This indicates that DHS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DHS | GDMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.13% | 24.97% | -21.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.12% | 53.89% | -46.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.35% | 63.99% | -50.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.87% | 47.19% | -33.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.06% | 47.19% | -31.13% |