PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DHS.L vs. WQDS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DHS.L vs. WQDS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree US High Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DHS.L) and iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DHS.L achieves a 12.15% return, which is significantly lower than WQDS.L's 15.20% return.


DHS.L

1D
-0.35%
1M
1.99%
6M
8.98%
YTD
12.15%
1Y
21.91%
3Y*
16.07%
5Y*
12.35%
10Y*
9.13%

WQDS.L

1D
-1.09%
1M
-0.53%
6M
13.28%
YTD
15.20%
1Y
28.06%
3Y*
17.31%
5Y*
12.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DHS.L vs. WQDS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DHS.L
WisdomTree US High Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
12.15%4.77%20.38%-4.02%19.92%25.61%-7.64%18.85%-2.86%1.90%
WQDS.L
iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
15.20%15.54%11.68%10.80%4.05%17.47%-3.37%18.77%-5.32%-20.48%

Correlation

The correlation between DHS.L and WQDS.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2017

0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between DHS.L and WQDS.L has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DHS.L vs. WQDS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DHS.L
DHS.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
DHS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
DHS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

WQDS.L
WQDS.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
WQDS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WQDS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
WQDS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
WQDS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
WQDS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DHS.L vs. WQDS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree US High Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DHS.L) and iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DHS.LWQDS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.49

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.58

4.14

-0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.31

15.36

-3.06

DHS.L vs. WQDS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DHS.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the WQDS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DHS.L and WQDS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DHS.L vs. WQDS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DHS.L drawdown since its inception was -38.98%, which is greater than WQDS.L's maximum drawdown of -30.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHS.L and WQDS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DHS.LWQDS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.98%

-30.62%

-8.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.40%

-6.75%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.50%

-14.93%

-2.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.39%

-14.93%

-3.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.32%

-1.36%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.19%

-8.99%

-0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

1.82%

+0.04%

Volatility

DHS.L vs. WQDS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree US High Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DHS.L) is 2.57%, while iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDS.L) has a volatility of 2.80%. This indicates that DHS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WQDS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DHS.LWQDS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.57%

2.80%

-0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.13%

8.17%

-0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.53%

10.50%

+0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.84%

11.60%

+2.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.89%

14.96%

-0.07%

DHS.L vs. WQDS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DHS.L has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than WQDS.L's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

DHS.L vs. WQDS.L - Dividend Comparison

DHS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, more than WQDS.L's 2.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DHS.L
WisdomTree US High Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
2.63%2.89%5.19%5.19%2.83%2.87%5.63%4.86%3.06%2.70%2.51%2.46%
WQDS.L
iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
2.15%2.34%2.56%2.86%2.97%2.70%3.03%3.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DHS.L and WQDS.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DHS.L is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DHS.L is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for WQDS.L.

DHS.L is categorized as Dividend, while WQDS.L is Global Equities. DHS.L tracks WisdomTree US High Dividend UCITS Index, while WQDS.L tracks MSCI World High Dividend Yield ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for DHS.L and 0.38% for WQDS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DHS.L and WQDS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer