DHR vs. IGM
DHR (Danaher Corporation) is a stock, while IGM (iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index. Over the past 10 years, DHR returned 11.04%/yr vs 24.86%/yr for IGM. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
DHR vs. IGM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DHR achieves a -21.65% return, which is significantly lower than IGM's 22.65% return. Over the past 10 years, DHR has underperformed IGM with an annualized return of 11.04%, while IGM has yielded a comparatively higher 24.86% annualized return.
DHR
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 4.05%
- YTD
- -21.65%
- 6M
- -22.19%
- 1Y
- -8.22%
- 3Y*
- -4.85%
- 5Y*
- -5.04%
- 10Y*
- 11.04%
IGM
- 1D
- -3.56%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- 22.65%
- 6M
- 21.02%
- 1Y
- 47.83%
- 3Y*
- 35.67%
- 5Y*
- 19.25%
- 10Y*
- 24.86%
DHR vs. IGM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHR Danaher Corporation | -21.65% | 0.35% | -0.35% | -1.22% | -19.02% | 48.57% | 45.34% | 49.55% | 11.80% | 20.01% |
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 22.65% | 26.76% | 36.99% | 60.68% | -35.83% | 25.72% | 45.11% | 41.81% | 2.26% | 37.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between DHR and IGM is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2001 | 0.56 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DHR and IGM has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DHR vs. IGM — Risk / Return Rank
DHR
IGM
DHR vs. IGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Danaher Corporation (DHR) and iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DHR | IGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.36 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.25 | 2.92 | -3.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.57 | 9.77 | -10.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DHR vs. IGM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DHR drawdown since its inception was -45.80%, smaller than the maximum IGM drawdown of -65.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHR and IGM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DHR | IGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.80% | -65.59% | +19.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.97% | -16.44% | -16.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.72% | -26.39% | -15.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.81% | -40.68% | -3.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.81% | -40.68% | -3.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.89% | -7.39% | -30.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.24% | -15.21% | +4.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.39% | 4.91% | +9.48% |
Volatility
DHR vs. IGM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Danaher Corporation (DHR) is 8.73%, while iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) has a volatility of 11.53%. This indicates that DHR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DHR | IGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.73% | 11.53% | -2.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.34% | 18.67% | +0.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.04% | 22.76% | +5.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.95% | 26.07% | +1.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.55% | 24.71% | +0.84% |
Dividends
DHR vs. IGM - Dividend Comparison
DHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, more than IGM's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHR Danaher Corporation | 0.76% | 0.56% | 0.47% | 12.64% | 0.38% | 0.26% | 0.32% | 0.44% | 0.62% | 0.60% | 32.55% | 0.58% |
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 0.14% | 0.17% | 0.22% | 0.33% | 0.66% | 0.16% | 0.32% | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.57% | 0.90% | 0.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DHR and IGM have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGM has higher volatility (11.53%) compared to DHR (8.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DHR dropped -45.80% vs IGM's -65.59%.
IGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DHR and IGM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer