PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DHPAX vs. CISMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DHPAX vs. CISMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Diamond Hill Mid Cap Fund (DHPAX) and Clarkston Partners Fund (CISMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DHPAX achieves a 8.39% return, which is significantly lower than CISMX's 9.91% return. Over the past 10 years, DHPAX has outperformed CISMX with an annualized return of 8.12%, while CISMX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.75% annualized return.


DHPAX

1D
1.17%
1M
1.23%
6M
5.35%
YTD
8.39%
1Y
14.39%
3Y*
12.98%
5Y*
7.03%
10Y*
8.12%
ALL TIME*
7.87%

CISMX

1D
0.65%
1M
0.87%
6M
8.20%
YTD
9.91%
1Y
10.88%
3Y*
3.24%
5Y*
2.02%
10Y*
6.75%
ALL TIME*
7.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

DHPAX vs. CISMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DHPAX
Diamond Hill Mid Cap Fund
8.39%12.95%10.48%9.19%-13.67%30.87%-2.01%25.38%-10.58%10.13%
CISMX
Clarkston Partners Fund
9.91%-8.37%4.49%6.41%-0.40%7.94%17.42%23.98%-7.25%12.84%

Correlation

The correlation between DHPAX and CISMX is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2015

0.87

The correlation between DHPAX and CISMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DHPAX vs. CISMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DHPAX
DHPAX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
DHPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
DHPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

CISMX
CISMX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
CISMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CISMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
CISMX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
CISMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
CISMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DHPAX vs. CISMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Diamond Hill Mid Cap Fund (DHPAX) and Clarkston Partners Fund (CISMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DHPAXCISMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.13

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.53

1.21

+0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.81

2.63

+2.18

DHPAX vs. CISMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DHPAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is higher than the CISMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DHPAX and CISMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DHPAX vs. CISMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DHPAX drawdown since its inception was -46.59%, which is greater than CISMX's maximum drawdown of -33.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHPAX and CISMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DHPAXCISMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.59%

-33.80%

-12.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.02%

-10.54%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.45%

-21.19%

+3.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.02%

-21.19%

-2.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.59%

-33.80%

-12.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

-5.92%

+5.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.81%

-6.75%

+0.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.18%

4.83%

-1.65%

Volatility

DHPAX vs. CISMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Diamond Hill Mid Cap Fund (DHPAX) is 3.49%, while Clarkston Partners Fund (CISMX) has a volatility of 8.06%. This indicates that DHPAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CISMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DHPAXCISMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.49%

8.06%

-4.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.94%

15.22%

-5.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.90%

18.91%

-5.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.49%

17.89%

+0.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.73%

18.46%

+2.27%

DHPAX vs. CISMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DHPAX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than CISMX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

DHPAX vs. CISMX - Dividend Comparison

DHPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.68%, more than CISMX's 4.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CISMX
Clarkston Partners Fund
4.23%4.65%1.05%3.76%16.95%0.81%3.73%3.79%7.15%1.30%1.17%0.09%
DHPAX
Diamond Hill Mid Cap Fund
16.68%18.08%8.84%2.20%4.96%0.30%0.53%1.79%2.84%1.49%0.63%0.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


DHPAX and CISMX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CISMX has higher volatility (8.06%) compared to DHPAX (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DHPAX dropped -46.59% vs CISMX's -33.80%.

DHPAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DHPAX and CISMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer