PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DHMAX vs. CISMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DHMAX vs. CISMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Diamond Hill Small-Mid Cap Fund (DHMAX) and Clarkston Partners Fund (CISMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DHMAX achieves a 2.66% return, which is significantly higher than CISMX's -0.48% return. Over the past 10 years, DHMAX has outperformed CISMX with an annualized return of 6.94%, while CISMX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.97% annualized return.


DHMAX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.18%
YTD
2.66%
6M
2.88%
1Y
14.14%
3Y*
9.45%
5Y*
3.72%
10Y*
6.94%

CISMX

1D
-1.03%
1M
0.32%
YTD
-0.48%
6M
-0.89%
1Y
-0.21%
3Y*
-0.02%
5Y*
-1.85%
10Y*
5.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DHMAX vs. CISMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DHMAX
Diamond Hill Small-Mid Cap Fund
2.66%8.26%7.77%11.15%-13.88%30.75%1.03%27.39%-12.85%5.47%
CISMX
Clarkston Partners Fund
-0.48%-8.37%4.49%6.41%-0.40%7.94%17.42%23.98%-7.25%12.84%

Correlation

The correlation between DHMAX and CISMX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2015

0.88

The correlation between DHMAX and CISMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DHMAX vs. CISMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DHMAX
DHMAX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
DHMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
DHMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

CISMX
CISMX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
CISMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CISMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
CISMX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
CISMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
CISMX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DHMAX vs. CISMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Diamond Hill Small-Mid Cap Fund (DHMAX) and Clarkston Partners Fund (CISMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DHMAXCISMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.02

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.45

0.05

+1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.30

0.12

+4.18

DHMAX vs. CISMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DHMAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is higher than the CISMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DHMAX and CISMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DHMAXCISMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

0.03

+0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

-0.11

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

0.33

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.36

-0.02

Drawdowns

DHMAX vs. CISMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DHMAX drawdown since its inception was -57.04%, which is greater than CISMX's maximum drawdown of -33.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHMAX and CISMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DHMAXCISMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.04%

-33.80%

-23.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.73%

-10.54%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.90%

-21.19%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.02%

-21.19%

-1.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.46%

-33.80%

-11.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.37%

-14.82%

+11.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.40%

-6.69%

-0.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.60%

4.68%

-1.08%

Volatility

DHMAX vs. CISMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Diamond Hill Small-Mid Cap Fund (DHMAX) is 3.77%, while Clarkston Partners Fund (CISMX) has a volatility of 4.55%. This indicates that DHMAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CISMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DHMAXCISMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.77%

4.55%

-0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.67%

12.71%

-2.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.53%

17.05%

-1.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.41%

17.48%

+1.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.06%

18.29%

+2.77%

DHMAX vs. CISMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DHMAX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than CISMX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

DHMAX vs. CISMX - Dividend Comparison

DHMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.98%, more than CISMX's 4.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CISMX
Clarkston Partners Fund
4.67%4.65%1.05%3.76%16.95%0.81%3.73%3.79%7.15%1.30%1.17%0.09%
DHMAX
Diamond Hill Small-Mid Cap Fund
5.98%6.14%7.75%1.00%5.01%5.55%0.49%4.81%4.51%0.45%1.74%1.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


DHMAX and CISMX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CISMX has higher volatility (4.55%) compared to DHMAX (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DHMAX dropped -57.04% vs CISMX's -33.80%.

DHMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DHMAX and CISMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer