DHMAX vs. CISMX
DHMAX (Diamond Hill Small-Mid Cap Fund) and CISMX (Clarkston Partners Fund) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, DHMAX returned 7.30%/yr vs 6.28%/yr for CISMX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DHMAX charges 1.21%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for CISMX.
Performance
DHMAX vs. CISMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DHMAX achieves a 1.96% return, which is significantly higher than CISMX's -2.22% return. Over the past 10 years, DHMAX has outperformed CISMX with an annualized return of 7.30%, while CISMX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.28% annualized return.
DHMAX
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 1.96%
- 6M
- 0.80%
- 1Y
- 10.51%
- 3Y*
- 9.16%
- 5Y*
- 4.28%
- 10Y*
- 7.30%
CISMX
- 1D
- -2.22%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- -2.22%
- 6M
- -3.07%
- 1Y
- -0.06%
- 3Y*
- -0.44%
- 5Y*
- -1.14%
- 10Y*
- 6.28%
DHMAX vs. CISMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHMAX Diamond Hill Small-Mid Cap Fund | 1.96% | 8.26% | 7.77% | 11.15% | -13.88% | 30.75% | 1.03% | 27.39% | -12.85% | 5.47% |
CISMX Clarkston Partners Fund | -2.22% | -8.37% | 4.49% | 6.41% | -0.40% | 7.94% | 17.42% | 23.98% | -7.25% | 12.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between DHMAX and CISMX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2015 | 0.88 |
The correlation between DHMAX and CISMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DHMAX vs. CISMX — Risk / Return Rank
DHMAX
CISMX
DHMAX vs. CISMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Diamond Hill Small-Mid Cap Fund (DHMAX) and Clarkston Partners Fund (CISMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DHMAX | CISMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.01 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.10 | -0.03 | +1.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.19 | -0.06 | +3.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DHMAX vs. CISMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DHMAX drawdown since its inception was -57.04%, which is greater than CISMX's maximum drawdown of -33.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHMAX and CISMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DHMAX | CISMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.04% | -33.80% | -23.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.73% | -10.54% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.90% | -21.19% | +0.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.02% | -21.19% | -1.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.46% | -33.80% | -11.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.02% | -16.31% | +12.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.38% | -6.73% | -0.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.68% | 4.81% | -1.13% |
Volatility
DHMAX vs. CISMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Diamond Hill Small-Mid Cap Fund (DHMAX) is 3.67%, while Clarkston Partners Fund (CISMX) has a volatility of 5.25%. This indicates that DHMAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CISMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DHMAX | CISMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.67% | 5.25% | -1.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.81% | 12.89% | -2.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.66% | 17.38% | -1.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.37% | 17.51% | +1.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.07% | 18.32% | +2.75% |
DHMAX vs. CISMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DHMAX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than CISMX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
DHMAX vs. CISMX - Dividend Comparison
DHMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.02%, more than CISMX's 4.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CISMX Clarkston Partners Fund | 4.76% | 4.65% | 1.05% | 3.76% | 16.95% | 0.81% | 3.73% | 3.79% | 7.15% | 1.30% | 1.17% | 0.09% |
DHMAX Diamond Hill Small-Mid Cap Fund | 6.02% | 6.14% | 7.75% | 1.00% | 5.01% | 5.55% | 0.49% | 4.81% | 4.51% | 0.45% | 1.74% | 1.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DHMAX and CISMX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CISMX has higher volatility (5.25%) compared to DHMAX (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DHMAX dropped -57.04% vs CISMX's -33.80%.
DHMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.75 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DHMAX and CISMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer