DHLX vs. WNTR
DHLX (Diamond Hill Large Cap Concentrated ETF) and WNTR (YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DHLX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Actively Managed, while WNTR is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. DHLX is passively managed, while WNTR is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.17, they often move in opposite directions. DHLX charges 0.55%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for WNTR.
Performance
DHLX vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DHLX achieves a 2.88% return, which is significantly lower than WNTR's 9.49% return.
DHLX
- 1D
- 2.41%
- 1M
- 3.47%
- 6M
- 2.53%
- YTD
- 2.88%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WNTR
- 1D
- 2.96%
- 1M
- 17.94%
- 6M
- 21.62%
- YTD
- 9.49%
- 1Y
- 127.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DHLX vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DHLX Diamond Hill Large Cap Concentrated ETF | 2.88% | 1.22% |
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | 9.49% | 63.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between DHLX and WNTR is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2025 | -0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DHLX vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank
DHLX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
WNTR
DHLX vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Diamond Hill Large Cap Concentrated ETF (DHLX) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DHLX | WNTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.35 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.02 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.72 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DHLX vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DHLX drawdown since its inception was -8.40%, smaller than the maximum WNTR drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHLX and WNTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DHLX | WNTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.40% | -42.65% | +34.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -42.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.14% | -10.67% | +9.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.66% | -20.46% | +17.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 16.63% | — |
Volatility
DHLX vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DHLX | WNTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 17.89% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 47.05% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.69% | 53.81% | -42.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.69% | 53.49% | -41.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.69% | 53.49% | -41.80% |
DHLX vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
DHLX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
DHLX vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison
DHLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than WNTR's 106.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
DHLX Diamond Hill Large Cap Concentrated ETF | 0.65% | 0.15% |
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | 106.86% | 58.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DHLX and WNTR have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DHLX is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DHLX is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.
WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 106.86%, compared with 0.65% for DHLX.
DHLX is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Diamond Hill and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for DHLX and 1.01% for WNTR.
Find the right allocation for DHLX and WNTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer