PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DHLX vs. OAKM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DHLX vs. OAKM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Diamond Hill Large Cap Concentrated ETF (DHLX) and Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF (OAKM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DHLX achieves a -1.10% return, which is significantly lower than OAKM's -0.63% return.


DHLX

1D
-0.38%
1M
-3.18%
YTD
-1.10%
6M
1.39%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

OAKM

1D
-0.63%
1M
-0.28%
YTD
-0.63%
6M
4.16%
1Y
15.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DHLX vs. OAKM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
DHLX
Diamond Hill Large Cap Concentrated ETF
-1.10%1.24%
OAKM
Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF
-0.63%6.23%

Correlation

The correlation between DHLX and OAKM is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2025

0.75

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DHLX vs. OAKM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DHLX

OAKM
OAKM Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
OAKM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OAKM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
OAKM Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
OAKM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
OAKM Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DHLX vs. OAKM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Diamond Hill Large Cap Concentrated ETF (DHLX) and Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF (OAKM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DHLX vs. OAKM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DHLXOAKMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.02

0.60

-0.58

Drawdowns

DHLX vs. OAKM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DHLX drawdown since its inception was -8.40%, smaller than the maximum OAKM drawdown of -15.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHLX and OAKM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DHLXOAKMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.40%

-15.24%

+6.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.97%

-3.09%

-1.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.36%

-2.76%

+0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

Volatility

DHLX vs. OAKM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DHLXOAKMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.43%

12.91%

-1.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.43%

16.49%

-5.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.43%

16.49%

-5.06%

DHLX vs. OAKM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DHLX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than OAKM's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

DHLX vs. OAKM - Dividend Comparison

DHLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than OAKM's 0.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
DHLX
Diamond Hill Large Cap Concentrated ETF
0.41%0.15%0.00%
OAKM
Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF
0.67%0.67%0.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


DHLX and OAKM have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DHLX is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DHLX is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for OAKM.

OAKM has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.41% for DHLX.

They also come from different issuers: Diamond Hill and Oakmark. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for DHLX and 0.59% for OAKM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DHLX and OAKM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer