DHLX vs. MULL
DHLX (Diamond Hill Large Cap Concentrated ETF) and MULL (GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DHLX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Actively Managed, while MULL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. DHLX is passively managed, while MULL is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. DHLX charges 0.55%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MULL.
Performance
DHLX vs. MULL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DHLX achieves a -1.56% return, which is significantly lower than MULL's 780.13% return.
DHLX
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -1.44%
- YTD
- -1.56%
- 6M
- -2.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MULL
- 1D
- -26.45%
- 1M
- 69.00%
- YTD
- 780.13%
- 6M
- 832.94%
- 1Y
- 3,622.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DHLX vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DHLX Diamond Hill Large Cap Concentrated ETF | -1.56% | 1.22% |
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 780.13% | 180.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between DHLX and MULL is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2025 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DHLX vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank
DHLX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MULL
DHLX vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Diamond Hill Large Cap Concentrated ETF (DHLX) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DHLX | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.71 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 69.24 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 221.31 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DHLX vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DHLX drawdown since its inception was -8.40%, smaller than the maximum MULL drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHLX and MULL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DHLX | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.40% | -72.29% | +63.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -53.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.41% | -26.45% | +21.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.56% | -20.52% | +17.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 16.58% | — |
Volatility
DHLX vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DHLX | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 74.91% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 119.83% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.31% | 145.72% | -134.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.31% | 142.49% | -131.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.31% | 142.49% | -131.18% |
DHLX vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison
DHLX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
DHLX vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison
DHLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, more than MULL's 0.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
DHLX Diamond Hill Large Cap Concentrated ETF | 0.41% | 0.15% |
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 0.04% | 0.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DHLX and MULL have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DHLX is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DHLX is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MULL.
DHLX has the higher dividend yield at 0.41%, compared with 0.04% for MULL.
DHLX is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while MULL is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Diamond Hill and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for DHLX and 1.50% for MULL.
Find the right allocation for DHLX and MULL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer