PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DHDG vs. RDVY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DHDG vs. RDVY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly 2.5 to 15 Buffer ETF (DHDG) and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DHDG achieves a 8.93% return, which is significantly lower than RDVY's 17.25% return.


DHDG

1D
0.44%
1M
1.33%
6M
6.98%
YTD
8.93%
1Y
16.40%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.84%

RDVY

1D
0.36%
1M
1.19%
6M
12.71%
YTD
17.25%
1Y
30.74%
3Y*
19.76%
5Y*
12.89%
10Y*
16.25%
ALL TIME*
13.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$405.89K$4.10M$2.06M
$77.65M$79.19M$83.63M

DHDG vs. RDVY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DHDG and RDVY is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2024

0.74

The correlation between DHDG and RDVY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

DHDG vs. RDVY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DHDG
RDVY

Technology

37.9%
19.4%

Financial Services

11.7%
38.9%

Communication Services

10.0%
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
11.1%

Healthcare

9.1%
5.6%

Industrials

8.4%
12.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
2.8%

Energy

3.0%
2.8%

Utilities

2.3%
1.4%

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.7%

-

Technology

DHDG
37.9%
RDVY
19.4%

Financial Services

DHDG
11.7%
RDVY
38.9%

Communication Services

DHDG
10.0%
RDVY
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

DHDG
9.6%
RDVY
11.1%

Healthcare

DHDG
9.1%
RDVY
5.6%

Industrials

DHDG
8.4%
RDVY
12.5%

Consumer Defensive

DHDG
4.6%
RDVY
2.8%

Energy

DHDG
3.0%
RDVY
2.8%

Utilities

DHDG
2.3%
RDVY
1.4%

Real Estate

DHDG
1.9%
RDVY

-

Basic Materials

DHDG
1.7%
RDVY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DHDG vs. RDVY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DHDG
DHDG Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
DHDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHDG Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
DHDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHDG Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

RDVY
RDVY Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
RDVY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDVY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDVY Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
RDVY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDVY Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DHDG vs. RDVY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly 2.5 to 15 Buffer ETF (DHDG) and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DHDGRDVYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.35

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.25

3.25

+1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.05

13.63

+3.42

DHDG vs. RDVY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DHDG Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is comparable to the RDVY Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DHDG and RDVY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DHDG vs. RDVY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DHDG drawdown since its inception was -8.26%, smaller than the maximum RDVY drawdown of -40.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHDG and RDVY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DHDGRDVYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.26%

-40.60%

+32.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.66%

-9.04%

+5.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.82%

-4.95%

+4.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.91%

2.15%

-1.24%

Volatility

DHDG vs. RDVY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly 2.5 to 15 Buffer ETF (DHDG) is 1.57%, while First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) has a volatility of 3.53%. This indicates that DHDG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RDVY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DHDGRDVYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.57%

3.53%

-1.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.58%

11.46%

-6.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.01%

14.65%

-8.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.42%

18.92%

-11.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.42%

21.03%

-13.61%

DHDG vs. RDVY - Expense Ratio Comparison

DHDG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than RDVY's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

DHDG vs. RDVY - Dividend Comparison

DHDG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RDVY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DHDG
FT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly 2.5 to 15 Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RDVY
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
0.83%1.11%1.64%2.09%2.21%1.04%1.53%1.55%1.68%1.25%2.07%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


DHDG and RDVY have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RDVY has higher volatility (3.53%) compared to DHDG (1.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DHDG dropped -8.26% vs RDVY's -40.60%.

On 1-year performance, RDVY leads with 30.74% vs 16.40% for DHDG. On fees, RDVY is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, DHDG has been the lower-risk option at 1.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RDVY has performed better with a 30.74% return vs 16.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RDVY is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DHDG.

RDVY has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.00% for DHDG.

DHDG is categorized as Defined Outcome, while RDVY is Dividend. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DHDG and 0.47% for RDVY.

DHDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DHDG and RDVY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer