DGZ vs. EDGH

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

DGZ (DB Gold Short Exchange Traded Notes) and EDGH (3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DGZ is a Inverse Commodities fund tracking the Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index - Optimum Yield Gold Excess Return (-100%), while EDGH is a Commodities fund actively managed by 3EDGE Asset Management. DGZ is passively managed, while EDGH is actively managed. Over the past year, DGZ returned -18.99% vs 27.95% for EDGH. Their -0.38 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. DGZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for EDGH.

Performance

DGZ vs. EDGH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DB Gold Short Exchange Traded Notes (DGZ) and 3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF (EDGH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGZ achieves a -2.82% return, which is significantly lower than EDGH's 10.22% return.

DGZ

• 1D: -12.96%
• 1M: -14.11%
• 6M: -3.97%
• YTD: -2.82%
• 1Y: -18.99%
• 3Y*: -18.82%
• 5Y*: -12.22%
• 10Y*: -8.53%
• ALL TIME*: -7.90%

EDGH

• 1D: 1.88%
• 1M: 2.34%
• 6M: 2.69%
• YTD: 10.22%
• 1Y: 27.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DGZ DB Gold Short Exchange Traded Notes	$26.88K	$31.34K	$38.49K
EDGH 3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF	$735.77K	$2.11M	$1.33M

DGZ vs. EDGH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
DGZ DB Gold Short Exchange Traded Notes	-2.82%	-32.55%	-3.21%
EDGH 3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF	10.22%	28.98%	-1.97%

Correlation

The correlation between DGZ and EDGH is -0.36, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2024	-0.38

Return for Risk

DGZ vs. EDGH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DGZ

DGZ Risk / Return Rank: 7
DGZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
DGZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
DGZ Omega Ratio Rank: 10
DGZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
DGZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5

EDGH

EDGH Risk / Return Rank: 52
EDGH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
EDGH Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
EDGH Omega Ratio Rank: 62
EDGH Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
EDGH Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DGZ vs. EDGH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DB Gold Short Exchange Traded Notes (DGZ) and 3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF (EDGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DGZ	EDGH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.26	1.53	-1.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.11	1.91	-1.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.31	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.53	2.25	-2.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.92	5.75	-6.67

DGZ vs. EDGH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.26, which is lower than the EDGH Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGZ and EDGH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DGZ vs. EDGH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGZ drawdown since its inception was -86.32%, which is greater than EDGH's maximum drawdown of -12.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGZ and EDGH.

Drawdown Indicators

	DGZ	EDGH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.32%	-12.47%	-73.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.14%	-12.47%	-23.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-59.54%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.54%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-71.49%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-83.35%	-6.72%	-76.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-57.95%	-2.68%	-55.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.66%	4.87%	+15.79%

Volatility

DGZ vs. EDGH - Volatility Comparison

DB Gold Short Exchange Traded Notes (DGZ) has a higher volatility of 24.24% compared to 3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF (EDGH) at 3.49%. This indicates that DGZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EDGH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DGZ	EDGH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.24%	3.49%	+20.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	60.86%	11.41%	+49.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	73.43%	18.35%	+55.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.19%	15.47%	+22.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.22%	15.47%	+13.75%

DGZ vs. EDGH - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than EDGH's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

DGZ vs. EDGH - Dividend Comparison

DGZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EDGH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
DGZ DB Gold Short Exchange Traded Notes	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EDGH 3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF	1.07%	1.18%	3.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DGZ and EDGH in my portfolio?

DGZ and EDGH have a correlation of -0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DGZ or EDGH?

DGZ has higher volatility (24.24%) compared to EDGH (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGZ dropped -86.32% vs EDGH's -12.47%.

Which ETF is better, DGZ or EDGH?

On 1-year performance, EDGH leads with 27.95% vs -18.99% for DGZ. On fees, DGZ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, EDGH has been the lower-risk option at 3.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DGZ or EDGH?

Over the 1-year period, EDGH has performed better with a 27.95% return vs -18.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DGZ or EDGH?

DGZ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for EDGH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DGZ or EDGH?

EDGH has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 0.00% for DGZ.

What is the main difference between DGZ and EDGH?

DGZ is categorized as Inverse Commodities, while EDGH is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and 3EDGE Asset Management. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for DGZ and 1.01% for EDGH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EDGH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.