DGZ vs. DGP
Compare and contrast key facts about DB Gold Short Exchange Traded Notes (DGZ) and DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes (DGP).
DGZ and DGP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DGZ is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index - Optimum Yield Gold Excess Return (-100%). It was launched on Feb 27, 2008. DGP is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index-Optimum Yield Gold (200%). It was launched on Feb 27, 2008. Both DGZ and DGP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
DGZ vs. DGP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DGZ vs. DGP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGZ DB Gold Short Exchange Traded Notes | -9.08% | -32.55% | -16.46% | -4.75% | 4.93% | 1.53% | -20.80% | -13.42% | 4.88% | -11.36% |
DGP DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes | 13.65% | 141.40% | 53.16% | 16.97% | -5.54% | -11.29% | 45.29% | 32.27% | -7.48% | 24.20% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGZ achieves a -9.08% return, which is significantly lower than DGP's 13.65% return. Over the past 10 years, DGZ has underperformed DGP with an annualized return of -9.99%, while DGP has yielded a comparatively higher 22.44% annualized return.
DGZ
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 11.14%
- YTD
- -9.08%
- 6M
- -16.77%
- 1Y
- -28.38%
- 3Y*
- -19.40%
- 5Y*
- -13.91%
- 10Y*
- -9.99%
DGP
- 1D
- 9.12%
- 1M
- -22.14%
- YTD
- 13.65%
- 6M
- 37.68%
- 1Y
- 101.12%
- 3Y*
- 63.02%
- 5Y*
- 38.30%
- 10Y*
- 22.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DGZ vs. DGP - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DGZ and DGP have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Return for Risk
DGZ vs. DGP — Risk / Return Rank
DGZ
DGP
DGZ vs. DGP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DB Gold Short Exchange Traded Notes (DGZ) and DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes (DGP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DGZ | DGP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | 1.84 | -2.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.65 | 2.24 | -2.90 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.32 | -0.40 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | 2.91 | -3.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.31 | 11.14 | -12.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DGZ | DGP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.59 | 1.84 | -2.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.50 | 1.01 | -1.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.43 | 0.64 | -1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.38 | 0.30 | -0.69 |
Correlation
The correlation between DGZ and DGP is -0.82. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
DGZ vs. DGP - Dividend Comparison
Neither DGZ nor DGP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
DGZ vs. DGP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGZ drawdown since its inception was -86.32%, which is greater than DGP's maximum drawdown of -75.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGZ and DGP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGZ | DGP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.32% | -75.31% | -11.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.53% | -36.58% | -4.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.54% | -51.24% | -10.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.49% | -51.24% | -20.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -84.42% | -24.38% | -60.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.48% | -41.24% | -16.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.88% | 9.54% | +12.34% |
Volatility
DGZ vs. DGP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DB Gold Short Exchange Traded Notes (DGZ) is 16.64%, while DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes (DGP) has a volatility of 25.22%. This indicates that DGZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DGZ | DGP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.64% | 25.22% | -8.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.96% | 48.02% | -4.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.50% | 55.31% | -6.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.23% | 38.32% | -10.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.03% | 34.93% | -11.90% |