PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGX vs. LMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DGX vs. LMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quest Diagnostics Incorporated (DGX) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGX achieves a 18.06% return, which is significantly higher than LMT's 13.04% return. Over the past 10 years, DGX has outperformed LMT with an annualized return of 12.33%, while LMT has yielded a comparatively lower 11.37% annualized return.


DGX

1D
-0.38%
1M
8.82%
YTD
18.06%
6M
12.22%
1Y
14.71%
3Y*
16.40%
5Y*
11.96%
10Y*
12.33%

LMT

1D
-1.52%
1M
5.40%
YTD
13.04%
6M
13.84%
1Y
14.07%
3Y*
8.98%
5Y*
9.78%
10Y*
11.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGX vs. LMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGX
Quest Diagnostics Incorporated
18.06%17.20%11.77%-10.05%-7.80%47.86%14.11%31.13%-13.84%9.16%
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
13.04%2.47%10.02%-4.31%40.48%3.15%-6.49%52.55%-16.35%31.77%

Correlation

The correlation between DGX and LMT is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 26, 1996

0.22

The correlation between DGX and LMT shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DGX:

$22.74B

LMT:

$124.87B

EPS

DGX:

$9.10

LMT:

$20.61

PE Ratio

DGX:

22.31

LMT:

26.21

PS Ratio

DGX:

2.03

LMT:

1.67

PB Ratio

DGX:

3.09

LMT:

16.67

Total Revenue (TTM)

DGX:

$11.28B

LMT:

$75.12B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DGX:

$3.75B

LMT:

$7.37B

EBITDA (TTM)

DGX:

$1.98B

LMT:

$8.09B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGX vs. LMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGX
DGX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
DGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
DGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

LMT
LMT Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
LMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMT Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
LMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMT Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGX vs. LMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quest Diagnostics Incorporated (DGX) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DGXLMTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.14

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

0.73

+0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.79

1.69

+1.10

DGX vs. LMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is comparable to the LMT Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGX and LMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DGX vs. LMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGX drawdown since its inception was -49.46%, smaller than the maximum LMT drawdown of -79.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGX and LMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGXLMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.46%

-79.29%

+29.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.55%

-25.15%

+13.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.57%

-31.79%

+15.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.62%

-31.79%

+3.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.60%

-36.67%

+0.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.76%

-19.63%

+15.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.89%

-26.83%

+14.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.56%

10.81%

-5.25%

Volatility

DGX vs. LMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Quest Diagnostics Incorporated (DGX) is 6.09%, while Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) has a volatility of 7.02%. This indicates that DGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGXLMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.09%

7.02%

-0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.94%

20.04%

-3.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.01%

26.71%

-3.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.81%

22.99%

-1.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.79%

23.76%

+0.03%

Dividends

DGX vs. LMT - Dividend Comparison

DGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than LMT's 2.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGX
Quest Diagnostics Incorporated
1.61%1.82%1.96%2.02%1.66%1.40%1.85%1.99%2.34%1.83%1.72%2.07%
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
2.53%2.76%2.62%2.68%2.34%2.98%2.76%2.31%3.13%2.32%2.71%2.83%

Financials

DGX vs. LMT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Quest Diagnostics Incorporated and Lockheed Martin Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
2.90B
18.02B
(DGX) Total Revenue
(LMT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

DGX vs. LMT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Quest Diagnostics Incorporated and Lockheed Martin Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
32.5%
11.5%
Portfolio components
DGX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quest Diagnostics Incorporated reported a gross profit of 942.00M and revenue of 2.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.5%.

LMT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.08B and revenue of 18.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.5%.

DGX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quest Diagnostics Incorporated reported an operating income of 399.00M and revenue of 2.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.8%.

LMT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported an operating income of 2.06B and revenue of 18.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.

DGX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quest Diagnostics Incorporated reported a net income of 252.00M and revenue of 2.90B, resulting in a net margin of 8.7%.

LMT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported a net income of 1.49B and revenue of 18.02B, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DGX and LMT have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LMT has higher volatility (7.02%) compared to DGX (6.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGX dropped -49.46% vs LMT's -79.29%.

LMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGX and LMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer