DGTSX vs. FSRRX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

DGTSX (DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio) and FSRRX (Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, DGTSX returned 5.24%/yr vs 5.38%/yr for FSRRX. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DGTSX charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for FSRRX.

Performance

DGTSX vs. FSRRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX) and Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund (FSRRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGTSX achieves a 3.80% return, which is significantly lower than FSRRX's 6.20% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DGTSX having a 5.24% annualized return and FSRRX not far ahead at 5.38%.

DGTSX

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 3.80%
• 6M: 3.58%
• 1Y: 8.78%
• 3Y*: 8.25%
• 5Y*: 5.14%
• 10Y*: 5.24%

FSRRX

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: -1.99%
• YTD: 6.20%
• 6M: 5.96%
• 1Y: 12.75%
• 3Y*: 9.18%
• 5Y*: 5.85%
• 10Y*: 5.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGTSX vs. FSRRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DGTSX DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio	3.80%	8.39%	7.43%	8.93%	-8.06%	10.20%	7.29%	9.80%	-1.85%	5.83%
FSRRX Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund	6.20%	10.45%	5.84%	4.59%	-3.34%	15.84%	3.74%	10.48%	-3.99%	3.00%

Correlation

The correlation between DGTSX and FSRRX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2005	0.64

The correlation between DGTSX and FSRRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

DGTSX vs. FSRRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGTSX

DGTSX Risk / Return Rank: 85
DGTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
DGTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
DGTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 85
DGTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
DGTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

FSRRX

FSRRX Risk / Return Rank: 86
FSRRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
FSRRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
FSRRX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
FSRRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
FSRRX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGTSX vs. FSRRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX) and Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund (FSRRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DGTSX	FSRRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.56	2.55	+0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.80	3.49	+0.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.49	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.50	4.13	-0.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.34	17.80	-2.46

DGTSX vs. FSRRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGTSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is comparable to the FSRRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGTSX and FSRRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DGTSX vs. FSRRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGTSX drawdown since its inception was -16.71%, smaller than the maximum FSRRX drawdown of -33.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGTSX and FSRRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DGTSX	FSRRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.71%	-33.42%	+16.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.64%	-3.00%	+0.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.46%	-5.80%	-1.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-11.26%	-12.78%	+1.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-11.26%	-19.93%	+8.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.61%	-3.00%	+2.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.64%	-4.21%	+2.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.60%	0.70%	-0.10%

Volatility

DGTSX vs. FSRRX - Volatility Comparison

DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX) has a higher volatility of 1.45% compared to Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund (FSRRX) at 1.37%. This indicates that DGTSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSRRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DGTSX	FSRRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.45%	1.37%	+0.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.00%	3.82%	-0.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.62%	4.88%	-1.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.98%	6.88%	-0.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.24%	6.73%	-1.49%

DGTSX vs. FSRRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGTSX has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than FSRRX's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

DGTSX vs. FSRRX - Dividend Comparison

DGTSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.72%, more than FSRRX's 4.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DGTSX DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio	5.72%	5.54%	7.28%	4.75%	2.77%	7.62%	2.12%	2.57%	2.99%	1.25%	1.26%	1.50%
FSRRX Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund	4.23%	4.68%	4.82%	5.29%	7.31%	5.35%	2.25%	3.05%	9.39%	1.57%	2.34%	1.75%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DGTSX and FSRRX in my portfolio?

DGTSX and FSRRX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DGTSX or FSRRX?

DGTSX has higher volatility (1.45%) compared to FSRRX (1.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGTSX dropped -16.71% vs FSRRX's -33.42%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DGTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.