PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGSIX vs. TIBIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGSIX vs. TIBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Global Allocation 60/40 Portfolio (DGSIX) and Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I (TIBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGSIX achieves a 8.39% return, which is significantly lower than TIBIX's 17.96% return. Over the past 10 years, DGSIX has underperformed TIBIX with an annualized return of 8.70%, while TIBIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.73% annualized return.


DGSIX

1D
0.34%
1M
3.26%
YTD
8.39%
6M
8.91%
1Y
19.26%
3Y*
14.33%
5Y*
7.70%
10Y*
8.70%

TIBIX

1D
0.65%
1M
3.13%
YTD
17.96%
6M
21.37%
1Y
39.83%
3Y*
26.83%
5Y*
16.44%
10Y*
12.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGSIX vs. TIBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGSIX
DFA Global Allocation 60/40 Portfolio
8.39%14.06%11.31%14.59%-12.10%14.24%11.58%18.17%-6.41%13.11%
TIBIX
Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I
17.96%37.01%13.48%18.28%-7.69%20.36%-0.40%18.01%-4.31%15.23%

Correlation

The correlation between DGSIX and TIBIX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2003

0.84

The correlation between DGSIX and TIBIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGSIX vs. TIBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGSIX
DGSIX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
DGSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
DGSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

TIBIX
TIBIX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
TIBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
TIBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGSIX vs. TIBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Global Allocation 60/40 Portfolio (DGSIX) and Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I (TIBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DGSIXTIBIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.96

-0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

7.48

-4.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.79

29.20

-14.41

DGSIX vs. TIBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGSIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is lower than the TIBIX Sharpe Ratio of 4.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGSIX and TIBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGSIXTIBIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.65

4.77

-2.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

1.48

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.95

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.77

-0.14

Drawdowns

DGSIX vs. TIBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGSIX drawdown since its inception was -41.64%, smaller than the maximum TIBIX drawdown of -48.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGSIX and TIBIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGSIXTIBIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.64%

-48.88%

+7.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.85%

-5.39%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.43%

-9.23%

-4.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.36%

-20.79%

+2.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.59%

-34.85%

+11.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.43%

-5.96%

+1.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.33%

1.38%

-0.05%

Volatility

DGSIX vs. TIBIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA Global Allocation 60/40 Portfolio (DGSIX) is 2.28%, while Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I (TIBIX) has a volatility of 3.12%. This indicates that DGSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TIBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGSIXTIBIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.28%

3.12%

-0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.87%

6.99%

-1.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.47%

8.46%

-0.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.19%

11.16%

-0.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.38%

13.50%

-3.12%

DGSIX vs. TIBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGSIX has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than TIBIX's 0.93% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGSIX vs. TIBIX - Dividend Comparison

DGSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.96%, more than TIBIX's 5.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGSIX
DFA Global Allocation 60/40 Portfolio
7.96%8.56%7.25%5.27%4.55%5.53%3.39%2.61%3.01%1.29%1.23%1.92%
TIBIX
Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I
5.03%5.83%5.67%4.89%5.89%5.33%4.31%4.46%4.77%4.52%4.14%4.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGSIX and TIBIX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TIBIX has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to DGSIX (2.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGSIX dropped -41.64% vs TIBIX's -48.88%.

TIBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.77 vs 2.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGSIX and TIBIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer