PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGSIX vs. BICSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGSIX vs. BICSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Global Allocation 60/40 Portfolio (DGSIX) and BlackRock Commodity Strategies Portfolio (BICSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGSIX achieves a 8.12% return, which is significantly lower than BICSX's 12.66% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DGSIX having a 8.89% annualized return and BICSX not far behind at 8.64%.


DGSIX

1D
-0.04%
1M
1.11%
YTD
8.12%
6M
7.63%
1Y
18.13%
3Y*
14.06%
5Y*
7.73%
10Y*
8.89%

BICSX

1D
-0.17%
1M
-6.72%
YTD
12.66%
6M
11.05%
1Y
28.31%
3Y*
15.43%
5Y*
11.01%
10Y*
8.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGSIX vs. BICSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGSIX
DFA Global Allocation 60/40 Portfolio
8.12%14.06%11.31%14.59%-12.10%14.24%11.58%18.17%-6.41%13.11%
BICSX
BlackRock Commodity Strategies Portfolio
12.66%28.70%4.38%-4.32%11.90%22.44%6.80%11.60%-14.50%8.28%

Correlation

The correlation between DGSIX and BICSX is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2011

0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between DGSIX and BICSX has dropped to 0.25 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGSIX vs. BICSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGSIX
DGSIX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
DGSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
DGSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

BICSX
BICSX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
BICSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BICSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
BICSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
BICSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
BICSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGSIX vs. BICSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Global Allocation 60/40 Portfolio (DGSIX) and BlackRock Commodity Strategies Portfolio (BICSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DGSIXBICSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.31

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.23

3.05

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.89

12.32

+1.57

DGSIX vs. BICSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGSIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is higher than the BICSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGSIX and BICSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DGSIX vs. BICSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGSIX drawdown since its inception was -41.64%, smaller than the maximum BICSX drawdown of -51.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGSIX and BICSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGSIXBICSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.64%

-51.59%

+9.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.85%

-8.98%

+3.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.43%

-10.53%

-2.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.36%

-22.35%

+3.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.59%

-35.82%

+12.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-8.98%

+8.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.42%

-20.47%

+16.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.36%

2.23%

-0.87%

Volatility

DGSIX vs. BICSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA Global Allocation 60/40 Portfolio (DGSIX) is 2.91%, while BlackRock Commodity Strategies Portfolio (BICSX) has a volatility of 3.88%. This indicates that DGSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BICSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGSIXBICSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.91%

3.88%

-0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.38%

12.21%

-5.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.86%

14.98%

-7.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.23%

15.79%

-5.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.40%

15.04%

-4.64%

DGSIX vs. BICSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGSIX has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than BICSX's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGSIX vs. BICSX - Dividend Comparison

DGSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.98%, more than BICSX's 2.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BICSX
BlackRock Commodity Strategies Portfolio
2.75%3.09%3.60%9.39%9.05%2.68%0.80%2.03%2.12%0.65%0.94%0.00%
DGSIX
DFA Global Allocation 60/40 Portfolio
7.98%8.56%7.25%5.27%4.55%5.53%3.39%2.61%3.01%1.29%1.23%1.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGSIX and BICSX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BICSX has higher volatility (3.88%) compared to DGSIX (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGSIX dropped -41.64% vs BICSX's -51.59%.

DGSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGSIX and BICSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer