PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGSCX vs. MBXAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGSCX vs. MBXAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Global Small-Cap Fund (DGSCX) and Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund (MBXAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGSCX achieves a 5.97% return, which is significantly lower than MBXAX's 13.56% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DGSCX having a 7.55% annualized return and MBXAX not far ahead at 7.59%.


DGSCX

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.00%
6M
0.84%
YTD
5.97%
1Y
-0.62%
3Y*
7.12%
5Y*
1.58%
10Y*
7.55%
ALL TIME*
8.15%

MBXAX

1D
0.73%
1M
-1.32%
6M
9.10%
YTD
13.56%
1Y
18.00%
3Y*
9.79%
5Y*
7.27%
10Y*
7.59%
ALL TIME*
8.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

DGSCX vs. MBXAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGSCX
Virtus Global Small-Cap Fund
5.97%-0.96%9.71%24.03%-24.11%11.23%29.79%23.02%-16.82%26.86%
MBXAX
Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund
13.56%4.13%13.17%-0.91%7.46%16.62%-0.72%13.59%-2.43%13.69%

Correlation

The correlation between DGSCX and MBXAX is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.53

Over the past year, the correlation between DGSCX and MBXAX has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGSCX vs. MBXAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DGSCX
DGSCX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
DGSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
DGSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

MBXAX
MBXAX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
MBXAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBXAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBXAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
MBXAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBXAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DGSCX vs. MBXAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Global Small-Cap Fund (DGSCX) and Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund (MBXAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DGSCXMBXAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.44

-0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.10

4.17

-4.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.22

16.27

-16.49

DGSCX vs. MBXAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGSCX Sharpe Ratio is -0.14, which is lower than the MBXAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGSCX and MBXAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DGSCX vs. MBXAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGSCX drawdown since its inception was -68.18%, which is greater than MBXAX's maximum drawdown of -31.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGSCX and MBXAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGSCXMBXAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.18%

-31.75%

-36.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.85%

-3.89%

-12.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.04%

-15.66%

-2.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.49%

-15.66%

-21.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.29%

-31.75%

-8.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.45%

-1.98%

-3.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.61%

-4.00%

-15.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.93%

1.01%

+6.92%

Volatility

DGSCX vs. MBXAX - Volatility Comparison

Virtus Global Small-Cap Fund (DGSCX) has a higher volatility of 2.94% compared to Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund (MBXAX) at 1.78%. This indicates that DGSCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBXAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGSCXMBXAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.94%

1.78%

+1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.86%

4.91%

+4.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.53%

6.90%

+5.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.88%

11.39%

+6.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.13%

13.36%

+5.77%

DGSCX vs. MBXAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGSCX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is lower than MBXAX's 2.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGSCX vs. MBXAX - Dividend Comparison

DGSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, while MBXAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DGSCX
Virtus Global Small-Cap Fund
4.35%4.61%14.50%0.84%2.64%30.56%4.16%7.03%21.96%7.99%0.00%
MBXAX
Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund
0.00%0.00%2.43%2.02%7.57%0.00%3.92%4.96%3.07%3.35%1.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGSCX and MBXAX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGSCX has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to MBXAX (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGSCX dropped -68.18% vs MBXAX's -31.75%.

MBXAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGSCX and MBXAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer