PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGS.TO vs. XEI.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGS.TO vs. XEI.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Dividend Growth Split Corp. (DGS.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF (XEI.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGS.TO achieves a 17.83% return, which is significantly lower than XEI.TO's 23.25% return. Over the past 10 years, DGS.TO has outperformed XEI.TO with an annualized return of 17.29%, while XEI.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 12.30% annualized return.


DGS.TO

1D
0.58%
1M
5.95%
YTD
17.83%
6M
23.80%
1Y
48.43%
3Y*
36.88%
5Y*
21.48%
10Y*
17.29%

XEI.TO

1D
0.85%
1M
3.41%
YTD
23.25%
6M
23.82%
1Y
45.53%
3Y*
22.82%
5Y*
15.75%
10Y*
12.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGS.TO vs. XEI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGS.TO
Dividend Growth Split Corp.
17.83%34.53%62.16%-6.12%-1.94%132.50%-33.14%69.73%-49.39%19.75%
XEI.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF
23.25%25.96%15.42%6.69%0.41%35.88%-7.53%25.44%-10.85%7.24%

Correlation

The correlation between DGS.TO and XEI.TO is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2011

0.52

Over the past year, the correlation between DGS.TO and XEI.TO has dropped to 0.23 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGS.TO vs. XEI.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGS.TO
DGS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
DGS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
DGS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

XEI.TO
XEI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
XEI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XEI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGS.TO vs. XEI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dividend Growth Split Corp. (DGS.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF (XEI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DGS.TOXEI.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

2.34

-0.69

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.32

20.39

-16.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.25

69.23

-50.98

DGS.TO vs. XEI.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.23, which is lower than the XEI.TO Sharpe Ratio of 6.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGS.TO and XEI.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGS.TOXEI.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.23

6.34

-3.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

1.41

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.77

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.67

-0.40

Drawdowns

DGS.TO vs. XEI.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGS.TO drawdown since its inception was -85.18%, which is greater than XEI.TO's maximum drawdown of -45.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGS.TO and XEI.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGS.TOXEI.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.18%

-45.51%

-39.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.26%

-2.24%

-9.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.87%

-9.92%

-17.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.18%

-17.32%

-22.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.34%

-45.51%

-17.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.17%

-5.05%

-9.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

0.66%

+2.00%

Volatility

DGS.TO vs. XEI.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dividend Growth Split Corp. (DGS.TO) is 2.39%, while iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF (XEI.TO) has a volatility of 2.89%. This indicates that DGS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XEI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGS.TOXEI.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.39%

2.89%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.92%

6.03%

+7.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.05%

7.24%

+7.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.94%

11.24%

+17.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.11%

16.01%

+19.10%

Dividends

DGS.TO vs. XEI.TO - Dividend Comparison

DGS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.89%, more than XEI.TO's 3.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGS.TO
Dividend Growth Split Corp.
13.89%15.40%17.47%5.86%17.42%14.68%5.88%15.18%24.93%14.85%15.33%17.91%
XEI.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF
3.53%4.39%5.56%5.08%4.78%3.65%5.13%4.71%5.53%4.37%4.51%5.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGS.TO and XEI.TO have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGS.TO and XEI.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer