DGS.TO vs. MNT.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Dividend Growth Split Corp. (DGS.TO) and Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Gold Reserves (MNT.TO).
Performance
DGS.TO vs. MNT.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DGS.TO vs. MNT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGS.TO Dividend Growth Split Corp. | 1.23% | 34.53% | 62.16% | -6.12% | -1.94% | 132.50% | -33.14% | 69.73% | -49.39% | 19.75% |
MNT.TO Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Gold Reserves | 6.88% | 61.23% | 44.81% | 3.61% | 10.52% | -10.51% | 26.14% | 13.47% | 5.87% | 5.52% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGS.TO achieves a 1.23% return, which is significantly lower than MNT.TO's 6.88% return. Over the past 10 years, DGS.TO has outperformed MNT.TO with an annualized return of 15.75%, while MNT.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 14.79% annualized return.
DGS.TO
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -7.78%
- YTD
- 1.23%
- 6M
- 10.57%
- 1Y
- 42.57%
- 3Y*
- 30.61%
- 5Y*
- 22.30%
- 10Y*
- 15.75%
MNT.TO
- 1D
- 3.93%
- 1M
- -11.28%
- YTD
- 6.88%
- 6M
- 14.20%
- 1Y
- 40.58%
- 3Y*
- 35.64%
- 5Y*
- 24.73%
- 10Y*
- 14.79%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGS.TO vs. MNT.TO — Risk / Return Rank
DGS.TO
MNT.TO
DGS.TO vs. MNT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dividend Growth Split Corp. (DGS.TO) and Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Gold Reserves (MNT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DGS.TO | MNT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.20 | 1.27 | +0.93 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.93 | 1.75 | +1.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.25 | +0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.68 | 1.62 | +2.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.84 | 5.94 | +8.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DGS.TO | MNT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.20 | 1.27 | +0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 1.24 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.76 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.47 | -0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between DGS.TO and MNT.TO is -0.08. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
DGS.TO vs. MNT.TO - Dividend Comparison
DGS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.29%, while MNT.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGS.TO Dividend Growth Split Corp. | 14.29% | 15.40% | 17.47% | 5.86% | 17.42% | 14.68% | 5.88% | 15.18% | 24.93% | 14.85% | 15.33% | 17.91% |
MNT.TO Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Gold Reserves | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
DGS.TO vs. MNT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGS.TO drawdown since its inception was -85.18%, which is greater than MNT.TO's maximum drawdown of -34.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGS.TO and MNT.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGS.TO | MNT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.18% | -34.79% | -50.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.26% | -25.01% | +13.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.18% | -25.01% | -15.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.34% | -33.58% | -29.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.78% | -14.82% | +7.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.31% | -15.65% | +1.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.88% | 6.81% | -3.93% |
Volatility
DGS.TO vs. MNT.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dividend Growth Split Corp. (DGS.TO) is 9.85%, while Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Gold Reserves (MNT.TO) has a volatility of 13.84%. This indicates that DGS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MNT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DGS.TO | MNT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.85% | 13.84% | -3.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.39% | 27.16% | -13.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.46% | 32.08% | -12.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.14% | 20.12% | +9.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.21% | 19.50% | +15.71% |