PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGS.TO vs. DF.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

DGS.TO vs. DF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Dividend Growth Split Corp. (DGS.TO) and Dividend 15 Split Corp. II (DF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DGS.TO vs. DF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGS.TO
Dividend Growth Split Corp.
1.23%34.53%62.16%-6.12%-1.94%132.50%-33.14%69.73%-49.39%19.75%
DF.TO
Dividend 15 Split Corp. II
2.53%47.92%74.13%4.68%-33.33%144.80%-38.01%65.78%-59.09%39.97%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DGS.TO:

CA$412.23M

DF.TO:

CA$172.20M

EPS

DGS.TO:

CA$4.53

DF.TO:

CA$6.35

PE Ratio

DGS.TO:

1.70

DF.TO:

1.17

PEG Ratio

DGS.TO:

0.04

DF.TO:

0.03

PS Ratio

DGS.TO:

1.57

DF.TO:

3.28

PB Ratio

DGS.TO:

0.97

DF.TO:

0.87

Total Revenue (TTM)

DGS.TO:

CA$246.01M

DF.TO:

CA$50.72M

Gross Profit (TTM)

DGS.TO:

CA$243.04M

DF.TO:

CA$118.58M

EBITDA (TTM)

DGS.TO:

CA$71.74M

DF.TO:

CA$172.63M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGS.TO achieves a 1.23% return, which is significantly lower than DF.TO's 2.53% return. Over the past 10 years, DGS.TO has outperformed DF.TO with an annualized return of 15.75%, while DF.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 12.97% annualized return.


DGS.TO

1D
0.13%
1M
-7.78%
YTD
1.23%
6M
10.57%
1Y
42.57%
3Y*
30.61%
5Y*
22.30%
10Y*
15.75%

DF.TO

1D
0.54%
1M
-6.19%
YTD
2.53%
6M
17.13%
1Y
64.13%
3Y*
39.27%
5Y*
22.90%
10Y*
12.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGS.TO vs. DF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGS.TO
DGS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
DGS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
DGS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

DF.TO
DF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
DF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
DF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
DF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
DF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGS.TO vs. DF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dividend Growth Split Corp. (DGS.TO) and Dividend 15 Split Corp. II (DF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DGS.TODF.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.20

3.05

-0.85

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.93

3.60

-0.67

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.68

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.68

5.13

-1.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.84

24.11

-9.28

DGS.TO vs. DF.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the DF.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGS.TO and DF.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGS.TODF.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

3.05

-0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.72

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.35

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.00

+0.25

Correlation

The correlation between DGS.TO and DF.TO is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

DGS.TO vs. DF.TO - Dividend Comparison

DGS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.29%, less than DF.TO's 14.80% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGS.TO
Dividend Growth Split Corp.
14.29%15.40%17.47%5.86%17.42%14.68%5.88%15.18%24.93%14.85%15.33%17.91%
DF.TO
Dividend 15 Split Corp. II
14.80%16.15%13.16%0.00%12.99%14.42%10.20%11.79%8.70%13.64%13.72%19.47%

Drawdowns

DGS.TO vs. DF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGS.TO drawdown since its inception was -85.18%, roughly equal to the maximum DF.TO drawdown of -83.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGS.TO and DF.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DGS.TODF.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.18%

-83.79%

-1.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.26%

-12.75%

+1.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.18%

-64.69%

+24.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.34%

-69.77%

+6.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.78%

-7.12%

-0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.31%

-22.97%

+8.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

2.71%

+0.17%

Volatility

DGS.TO vs. DF.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dividend Growth Split Corp. (DGS.TO) is 9.85%, while Dividend 15 Split Corp. II (DF.TO) has a volatility of 11.68%. This indicates that DGS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DGS.TODF.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.85%

11.68%

-1.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.39%

14.71%

-1.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.46%

21.16%

-1.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.14%

32.20%

-3.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.21%

36.93%

-1.72%

Financials

DGS.TO vs. DF.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Dividend Growth Split Corp. and Dividend 15 Split Corp. II. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-20.00M0.0020.00M40.00M60.00M80.00M20212022202320242025
27.30M
9.94M
(DGS.TO) Total Revenue
(DF.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items