PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGRO vs. VTV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGRO vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGRO achieves a 8.47% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 11.91% return. Over the past 10 years, DGRO has outperformed VTV with an annualized return of 13.26%, while VTV has yielded a comparatively lower 12.42% annualized return.


DGRO

1D
-0.29%
1M
2.67%
YTD
8.47%
6M
9.27%
1Y
21.90%
3Y*
16.63%
5Y*
10.64%
10Y*
13.26%

VTV

1D
0.25%
1M
2.67%
YTD
11.91%
6M
13.41%
1Y
25.49%
3Y*
17.72%
5Y*
11.30%
10Y*
12.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGRO vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
8.47%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%9.50%29.87%-2.38%23.00%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
11.91%15.27%15.95%9.32%-2.09%26.53%2.33%25.66%-5.47%17.15%

Correlation

The correlation between DGRO and VTV is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2014

0.97

The correlation between DGRO and VTV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

DGRO vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DGRO
VTV

Financial Services

21.2%
22.3%

Technology

19.4%
13.4%

Healthcare

16.4%
14.5%

Consumer Defensive

11.5%
9.4%

Industrials

10.8%
14.0%

Utilities

6.9%
5.2%

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%
4.0%

Energy

5.6%
8.1%

Basic Materials

2.5%
3.1%

Communication Services

0.1%
3.3%

Real Estate

-

2.8%

Financial Services

DGRO
21.2%
VTV
22.3%

Technology

DGRO
19.4%
VTV
13.4%

Healthcare

DGRO
16.4%
VTV
14.5%

Consumer Defensive

DGRO
11.5%
VTV
9.4%

Industrials

DGRO
10.8%
VTV
14.0%

Utilities

DGRO
6.9%
VTV
5.2%

Consumer Cyclical

DGRO
5.7%
VTV
4.0%

Energy

DGRO
5.6%
VTV
8.1%

Basic Materials

DGRO
2.5%
VTV
3.1%

Communication Services

DGRO
0.1%
VTV
3.3%

Real Estate

DGRO

-

VTV
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGRO vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

VTV
VTV Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGRO vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DGROVTVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.45

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

4.03

-0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.12

15.20

-2.08

DGRO vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGRO Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRO and VTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGROVTVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

2.52

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.82

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.75

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.51

+0.25

Drawdowns

DGRO vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRO drawdown since its inception was -35.10%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRO and VTV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGROVTVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.10%

-59.27%

+24.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

-6.35%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.03%

-14.52%

+0.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.31%

-17.04%

-2.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.10%

-36.78%

+1.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.07%

-1.11%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.44%

-7.87%

+4.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

1.68%

-0.01%

Volatility

DGRO vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) is 2.32%, while Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) has a volatility of 2.65%. This indicates that DGRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGROVTVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.32%

2.65%

-0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.95%

7.67%

-0.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.52%

10.18%

-0.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.82%

13.89%

-0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.63%

16.68%

-0.05%

DGRO vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGRO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DGRO vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

DGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, more than VTV's 1.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.96%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
1.87%2.05%2.31%2.46%2.52%2.15%2.56%2.50%2.73%2.29%2.44%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, DGRO and VTV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VTV has higher volatility (2.65%) compared to DGRO (2.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRO dropped -35.10% vs VTV's -59.27%.

On 10-year performance, DGRO leads with 13.26% vs 12.42% for VTV. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 13.26% return vs 12.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for DGRO.

DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 1.87% for VTV.

DGRO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VTV is Large Cap Value Equities. DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index, while VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for DGRO and 0.04% for VTV.

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGRO and VTV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer