DGRO vs. MSFT
DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index, while MSFT (Microsoft Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, DGRO returned 13.52%/yr vs 24.39%/yr for MSFT. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
DGRO vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGRO achieves a 9.86% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's -18.85% return. Over the past 10 years, DGRO has underperformed MSFT with an annualized return of 13.52%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively higher 24.39% annualized return.
DGRO
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 3.74%
- YTD
- 9.86%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- 1Y
- 22.26%
- 3Y*
- 16.74%
- 5Y*
- 10.82%
- 10Y*
- 13.52%
MSFT
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -3.36%
- YTD
- -18.85%
- 6M
- -17.98%
- 1Y
- -17.75%
- 3Y*
- 6.16%
- 5Y*
- 9.56%
- 10Y*
- 24.39%
DGRO vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 9.86% | 15.69% | 16.62% | 10.47% | -7.91% | 26.64% | 9.50% | 29.87% | -2.38% | 23.00% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | -18.85% | 15.58% | 12.93% | 58.19% | -28.02% | 52.48% | 42.53% | 57.56% | 20.80% | 40.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGRO and MSFT is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2014 | 0.57 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DGRO and MSFT has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGRO vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank
DGRO
MSFT
DGRO vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DGRO | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 0.89 | +0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.46 | -0.53 | +3.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.36 | -1.08 | +14.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DGRO vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGRO drawdown since its inception was -35.10%, smaller than the maximum MSFT drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRO and MSFT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGRO | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.10% | -69.38% | +34.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.47% | -33.91% | +27.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.03% | -33.91% | +19.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.31% | -37.15% | +17.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.10% | -37.15% | +2.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -27.46% | +27.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.44% | -21.78% | +18.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 16.48% | -14.80% |
Volatility
DGRO vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) is 2.64%, while Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) has a volatility of 10.52%. This indicates that DGRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGRO | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.64% | 10.52% | -7.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.96% | 22.31% | -15.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.59% | 25.42% | -15.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.83% | 26.66% | -12.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.62% | 27.06% | -10.44% |
Dividends
DGRO vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison
DGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, more than MSFT's 0.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.94% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 0.91% | 0.70% | 0.73% | 0.74% | 1.06% | 0.68% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 1.69% | 1.86% | 2.37% | 2.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DGRO and MSFT have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSFT has higher volatility (10.52%) compared to DGRO (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRO dropped -35.10% vs MSFT's -69.38%.
DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DGRO and MSFT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer