PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGRO vs. ILCG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGRO vs. ILCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGRO achieves a 15.02% return, which is significantly higher than ILCG's 12.84% return. Over the past 10 years, DGRO has underperformed ILCG with an annualized return of 13.50%, while ILCG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.56% annualized return.


DGRO

1D
1.09%
1M
2.42%
6M
10.12%
YTD
15.02%
1Y
24.63%
3Y*
17.52%
5Y*
11.29%
10Y*
13.50%
ALL TIME*
12.59%

ILCG

1D
2.86%
1M
2.72%
6M
13.81%
YTD
12.84%
1Y
17.11%
3Y*
24.25%
5Y*
12.20%
10Y*
17.56%
ALL TIME*
11.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$108.47M$103.38M$110.52M
$5.63M$6.82M$9.80M

DGRO vs. ILCG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
15.02%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%9.50%29.87%-2.38%23.00%
ILCG
iShares Morningstar Growth ETF
12.84%16.71%32.82%40.41%-31.75%24.33%38.56%33.22%2.06%30.57%

Correlation

The correlation between DGRO and ILCG is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2014

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between DGRO and ILCG has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DGRO vs. ILCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DGRO
ILCG

Financial Services

20.4%
4.7%

Healthcare

17.9%
5.3%

Technology

17.3%
54.1%

Consumer Defensive

11.9%
1.6%

Industrials

11.3%
10.9%

Utilities

7.3%
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

6.5%
9.2%

Energy

4.8%
0.7%

Basic Materials

2.5%
1.4%

Communication Services

0.1%
9.7%

Real Estate

-

1.5%

Financial Services

DGRO
20.4%
ILCG
4.7%

Healthcare

DGRO
17.9%
ILCG
5.3%

Technology

DGRO
17.3%
ILCG
54.1%

Consumer Defensive

DGRO
11.9%
ILCG
1.6%

Industrials

DGRO
11.3%
ILCG
10.9%

Utilities

DGRO
7.3%
ILCG
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

DGRO
6.5%
ILCG
9.2%

Energy

DGRO
4.8%
ILCG
0.7%

Basic Materials

DGRO
2.5%
ILCG
1.4%

Communication Services

DGRO
0.1%
ILCG
9.7%

Real Estate

DGRO

-

ILCG
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGRO vs. ILCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

ILCG
ILCG Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
ILCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILCG Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
ILCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILCG Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DGRO vs. ILCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DGROILCGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.17

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.83

1.10

+2.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.91

3.48

+11.42

DGRO vs. ILCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGRO Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is higher than the ILCG Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRO and ILCG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DGRO vs. ILCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRO drawdown since its inception was -35.10%, smaller than the maximum ILCG drawdown of -52.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRO and ILCG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGROILCGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.10%

-52.98%

+17.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

-15.65%

+9.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.03%

-23.10%

+9.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.31%

-35.38%

+16.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.10%

-35.38%

+0.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.44%

+2.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.40%

-8.19%

+4.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.66%

4.92%

-3.26%

Volatility

DGRO vs. ILCG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) is 3.05%, while iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) has a volatility of 6.81%. This indicates that DGRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ILCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGROILCGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.05%

6.81%

-3.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.16%

15.85%

-8.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.58%

18.91%

-9.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.80%

22.42%

-8.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.59%

21.73%

-5.14%

DGRO vs. ILCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGRO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DGRO vs. ILCG - Dividend Comparison

DGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, more than ILCG's 0.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.87%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
ILCG
iShares Morningstar Growth ETF
0.41%0.47%0.50%0.69%0.75%0.34%0.28%0.54%0.81%0.89%0.95%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGRO and ILCG have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ILCG has higher volatility (6.81%) compared to DGRO (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRO dropped -35.10% vs ILCG's -52.98%.

On 10-year performance, ILCG leads with 17.56% vs 13.50% for DGRO. On fees, ILCG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 3.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ILCG has performed better with a 17.56% return vs 13.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ILCG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for DGRO.

DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 0.41% for ILCG.

DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index, while ILCG tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index Gross. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for DGRO and 0.04% for ILCG.

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGRO and ILCG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer