PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGRO vs. ILCG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGRO vs. ILCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGRO achieves a 8.76% return, which is significantly lower than ILCG's 14.48% return. Over the past 10 years, DGRO has underperformed ILCG with an annualized return of 13.30%, while ILCG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.15% annualized return.


DGRO

1D
-0.28%
1M
3.14%
YTD
8.76%
6M
8.75%
1Y
22.54%
3Y*
16.99%
5Y*
10.54%
10Y*
13.30%

ILCG

1D
-1.02%
1M
7.68%
YTD
14.48%
6M
14.61%
1Y
29.51%
3Y*
26.55%
5Y*
14.95%
10Y*
18.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGRO vs. ILCG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
8.76%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%9.50%29.87%-2.38%23.00%
ILCG
iShares Morningstar Growth ETF
14.48%16.71%32.82%40.41%-31.75%24.33%38.56%33.22%2.06%30.57%

Correlation

The correlation between DGRO and ILCG is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2014

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between DGRO and ILCG has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DGRO vs. ILCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DGRO
ILCG

Financial Services

21.2%
6.0%

Technology

19.4%
49.8%

Healthcare

16.4%
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

11.5%
1.6%

Industrials

10.8%
8.3%

Utilities

6.9%
0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%
10.6%

Energy

5.6%
0.5%

Basic Materials

2.5%
1.1%

Communication Services

0.1%
14.5%

Real Estate

-

1.4%

Financial Services

DGRO
21.2%
ILCG
6.0%

Technology

DGRO
19.4%
ILCG
49.8%

Healthcare

DGRO
16.4%
ILCG
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

DGRO
11.5%
ILCG
1.6%

Industrials

DGRO
10.8%
ILCG
8.3%

Utilities

DGRO
6.9%
ILCG
0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

DGRO
5.7%
ILCG
10.6%

Energy

DGRO
5.6%
ILCG
0.5%

Basic Materials

DGRO
2.5%
ILCG
1.1%

Communication Services

DGRO
0.1%
ILCG
14.5%

Real Estate

DGRO

-

ILCG
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGRO vs. ILCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

ILCG
ILCG Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
ILCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILCG Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
ILCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILCG Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGRO vs. ILCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DGROILCGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.32

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.50

1.89

+1.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.52

6.68

+6.84

DGRO vs. ILCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGRO Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is higher than the ILCG Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRO and ILCG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGROILCGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

1.82

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.68

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.85

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.59

+0.18

Drawdowns

DGRO vs. ILCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRO drawdown since its inception was -35.10%, smaller than the maximum ILCG drawdown of -52.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRO and ILCG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGROILCGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.10%

-52.98%

+17.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

-15.65%

+9.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.03%

-23.10%

+9.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.31%

-35.38%

+16.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.10%

-35.38%

+0.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-1.02%

+0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.44%

-8.22%

+4.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

4.43%

-2.76%

Volatility

DGRO vs. ILCG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) is 2.21%, while iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) has a volatility of 4.40%. This indicates that DGRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ILCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGROILCGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.21%

4.40%

-2.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.91%

12.81%

-5.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.48%

16.31%

-6.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.82%

22.00%

-8.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.62%

21.53%

-4.91%

DGRO vs. ILCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGRO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DGRO vs. ILCG - Dividend Comparison

DGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, more than ILCG's 0.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.96%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
ILCG
iShares Morningstar Growth ETF
0.40%0.47%0.50%0.69%0.75%0.34%0.28%0.54%0.81%0.89%0.95%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGRO and ILCG have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ILCG has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to DGRO (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRO dropped -35.10% vs ILCG's -52.98%.

On 10-year performance, ILCG leads with 18.15% vs 13.30% for DGRO. On fees, ILCG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ILCG has performed better with a 18.15% return vs 13.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ILCG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for DGRO.

DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 0.40% for ILCG.

DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index, while ILCG tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index Gross. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for DGRO and 0.04% for ILCG.

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGRO and ILCG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer