DGRO vs. FDVV
DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) and FDVV (Fidelity High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index, while FDVV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Core Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DGRO returned 10.54%/yr vs 13.36%/yr for FDVV. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DGRO charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FDVV.
Performance
DGRO vs. FDVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DGRO having a 8.76% return and FDVV slightly lower at 8.39%.
DGRO
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 3.14%
- YTD
- 8.76%
- 6M
- 8.75%
- 1Y
- 22.54%
- 3Y*
- 16.99%
- 5Y*
- 10.54%
- 10Y*
- 13.30%
FDVV
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- 4.44%
- YTD
- 8.39%
- 6M
- 8.67%
- 1Y
- 23.45%
- 3Y*
- 20.08%
- 5Y*
- 13.36%
- 10Y*
- —
DGRO vs. FDVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 8.76% | 15.69% | 16.62% | 10.47% | -7.91% | 26.64% | 9.50% | 29.87% | -2.38% | 23.00% |
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | 8.39% | 17.08% | 21.81% | 18.00% | -4.21% | 29.24% | 2.80% | 24.07% | -1.26% | 14.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGRO and FDVV is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016 | 0.91 |
The correlation between DGRO and FDVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
DGRO vs. FDVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DGRO
FDVV
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
DGRO
FDVV
Technology
DGRO
FDVV
Healthcare
DGRO
FDVV
Consumer Defensive
DGRO
FDVV
Industrials
DGRO
FDVV
Utilities
DGRO
FDVV
Consumer Cyclical
DGRO
FDVV
Energy
DGRO
FDVV
-
Basic Materials
DGRO
FDVV
-
Communication Services
DGRO
FDVV
Real Estate
DGRO
-
FDVV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGRO vs. FDVV — Risk / Return Rank
DGRO
FDVV
DGRO vs. FDVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DGRO | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.43 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.50 | 2.53 | +0.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.52 | 10.54 | +2.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DGRO | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.39 | 2.35 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.91 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.79 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
DGRO vs. FDVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGRO drawdown since its inception was -35.10%, smaller than the maximum FDVV drawdown of -40.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRO and FDVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGRO | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.10% | -40.25% | +5.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.47% | -9.30% | +2.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.03% | -15.90% | +1.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.31% | -20.18% | +0.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | -1.12% | +0.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.44% | -3.81% | +0.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.67% | 2.23% | -0.56% |
Volatility
DGRO vs. FDVV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) is 2.21%, while Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) has a volatility of 3.14%. This indicates that DGRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGRO | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.21% | 3.14% | -0.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.91% | 7.99% | -1.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.48% | 10.06% | -0.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.82% | 14.75% | -0.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.62% | 17.00% | -0.38% |
DGRO vs. FDVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGRO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FDVV's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
DGRO vs. FDVV - Dividend Comparison
DGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, less than FDVV's 2.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.96% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | 2.72% | 2.89% | 2.94% | 3.77% | 3.44% | 2.70% | 3.19% | 3.93% | 4.05% | 3.66% | 1.04% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DGRO and FDVV have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDVV has higher volatility (3.14%) compared to DGRO (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRO dropped -35.10% vs FDVV's -40.25%.
On 5-year performance, FDVV leads with 13.36% vs 10.54% for DGRO. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FDVV has performed better with a 13.36% return vs 10.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FDVV.
FDVV has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 1.96% for DGRO.
DGRO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FDVV is Large Cap Blend Equities. DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index, while FDVV tracks Fidelity Core Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for DGRO and 0.29% for FDVV.
DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DGRO and FDVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer