PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGRO vs. FDVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGRO vs. FDVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DGRO having a 8.76% return and FDVV slightly lower at 8.39%.


DGRO

1D
-0.28%
1M
3.14%
YTD
8.76%
6M
8.75%
1Y
22.54%
3Y*
16.99%
5Y*
10.54%
10Y*
13.30%

FDVV

1D
-1.12%
1M
4.44%
YTD
8.39%
6M
8.67%
1Y
23.45%
3Y*
20.08%
5Y*
13.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGRO vs. FDVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
8.76%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%9.50%29.87%-2.38%23.00%
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
8.39%17.08%21.81%18.00%-4.21%29.24%2.80%24.07%-1.26%14.00%

Correlation

The correlation between DGRO and FDVV is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016

0.91

The correlation between DGRO and FDVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

DGRO vs. FDVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DGRO
FDVV

Financial Services

21.2%
17.0%

Technology

19.4%
29.1%

Healthcare

16.4%
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

11.5%
11.0%

Industrials

10.8%
3.4%

Utilities

6.9%
8.7%

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%
13.6%

Energy

5.6%

-

Basic Materials

2.5%

-

Communication Services

0.1%
3.7%

Real Estate

-

10.1%

Financial Services

DGRO
21.2%
FDVV
17.0%

Technology

DGRO
19.4%
FDVV
29.1%

Healthcare

DGRO
16.4%
FDVV
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

DGRO
11.5%
FDVV
11.0%

Industrials

DGRO
10.8%
FDVV
3.4%

Utilities

DGRO
6.9%
FDVV
8.7%

Consumer Cyclical

DGRO
5.7%
FDVV
13.6%

Energy

DGRO
5.6%
FDVV

-

Basic Materials

DGRO
2.5%
FDVV

-

Communication Services

DGRO
0.1%
FDVV
3.7%

Real Estate

DGRO

-

FDVV
10.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGRO vs. FDVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

FDVV
FDVV Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FDVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDVV Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FDVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDVV Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGRO vs. FDVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DGROFDVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.43

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.50

2.53

+0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.52

10.54

+2.99

DGRO vs. FDVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGRO Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the FDVV Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRO and FDVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGROFDVVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

2.35

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.91

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.79

-0.03

Drawdowns

DGRO vs. FDVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRO drawdown since its inception was -35.10%, smaller than the maximum FDVV drawdown of -40.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRO and FDVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGROFDVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.10%

-40.25%

+5.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

-9.30%

+2.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.03%

-15.90%

+1.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.31%

-20.18%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-1.12%

+0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.44%

-3.81%

+0.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

2.23%

-0.56%

Volatility

DGRO vs. FDVV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) is 2.21%, while Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) has a volatility of 3.14%. This indicates that DGRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGROFDVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.21%

3.14%

-0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.91%

7.99%

-1.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.48%

10.06%

-0.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.82%

14.75%

-0.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.62%

17.00%

-0.38%

DGRO vs. FDVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGRO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FDVV's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGRO vs. FDVV - Dividend Comparison

DGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, less than FDVV's 2.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.96%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
2.72%2.89%2.94%3.77%3.44%2.70%3.19%3.93%4.05%3.66%1.04%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGRO and FDVV have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDVV has higher volatility (3.14%) compared to DGRO (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRO dropped -35.10% vs FDVV's -40.25%.

On 5-year performance, FDVV leads with 13.36% vs 10.54% for DGRO. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDVV has performed better with a 13.36% return vs 10.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FDVV.

FDVV has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 1.96% for DGRO.

DGRO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FDVV is Large Cap Blend Equities. DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index, while FDVV tracks Fidelity Core Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for DGRO and 0.29% for FDVV.

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGRO and FDVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer