DGRO vs. CMCSA
DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index, while CMCSA (Comcast Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, DGRO returned 13.52%/yr vs 1.27%/yr for CMCSA. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
DGRO vs. CMCSA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGRO achieves a 9.86% return, which is significantly higher than CMCSA's -5.28% return. Over the past 10 years, DGRO has outperformed CMCSA with an annualized return of 13.52%, while CMCSA has yielded a comparatively lower 1.27% annualized return.
DGRO
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 2.86%
- YTD
- 9.86%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- 1Y
- 23.49%
- 3Y*
- 16.74%
- 5Y*
- 10.82%
- 10Y*
- 13.52%
CMCSA
- 1D
- 2.21%
- 1M
- -2.66%
- YTD
- -5.28%
- 6M
- 3.97%
- 1Y
- -17.53%
- 3Y*
- -8.98%
- 5Y*
- -10.72%
- 10Y*
- 1.27%
DGRO vs. CMCSA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 9.86% | 15.69% | 16.62% | 10.47% | -7.91% | 26.64% | 9.50% | 29.87% | -2.38% | 23.00% |
CMCSA Comcast Corporation | -5.28% | -17.35% | -11.84% | 29.08% | -28.68% | -2.22% | 19.13% | 34.04% | -12.71% | 17.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGRO and CMCSA is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2014 | 0.58 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DGRO and CMCSA has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGRO vs. CMCSA — Risk / Return Rank
DGRO
CMCSA
DGRO vs. CMCSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and Comcast Corporation (CMCSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DGRO | CMCSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 0.90 | +0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.46 | -0.67 | +4.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.36 | -1.26 | +14.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DGRO vs. CMCSA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGRO drawdown since its inception was -35.10%, smaller than the maximum CMCSA drawdown of -67.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRO and CMCSA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGRO | CMCSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.10% | -67.89% | +32.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.47% | -27.34% | +20.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.03% | -39.87% | +25.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.31% | -52.11% | +32.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.10% | -52.11% | +17.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -47.99% | +47.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.44% | -24.62% | +21.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 14.38% | -12.70% |
Volatility
DGRO vs. CMCSA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) is 2.64%, while Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) has a volatility of 7.12%. This indicates that DGRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMCSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGRO | CMCSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.64% | 7.12% | -4.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.96% | 24.86% | -17.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.59% | 29.24% | -19.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.83% | 26.96% | -13.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.62% | 26.49% | -9.87% |
Dividends
DGRO vs. CMCSA - Dividend Comparison
DGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, less than CMCSA's 11.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMCSA Comcast Corporation | 11.84% | 4.35% | 3.25% | 2.60% | 3.03% | 1.95% | 1.72% | 1.40% | 2.69% | 1.18% | 1.96% | 1.73% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.94% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DGRO and CMCSA have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CMCSA has higher volatility (7.12%) compared to DGRO (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRO dropped -35.10% vs CMCSA's -67.89%.
DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DGRO and CMCSA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer