DGRO vs. AIQ
DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) and AIQ (Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index, while AIQ is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DGRO returned 11.42%/yr vs 17.07%/yr for AIQ. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DGRO charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for AIQ.
Performance
DGRO vs. AIQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGRO achieves a 9.00% return, which is significantly lower than AIQ's 26.48% return.
DGRO
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- 2.07%
- YTD
- 9.00%
- 6M
- 9.32%
- 1Y
- 23.07%
- 3Y*
- 16.05%
- 5Y*
- 11.42%
- 10Y*
- 13.42%
AIQ
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 5.95%
- YTD
- 26.48%
- 6M
- 31.48%
- 1Y
- 53.73%
- 3Y*
- 31.70%
- 5Y*
- 17.07%
- 10Y*
- —
DGRO vs. AIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 9.00% | 15.69% | 16.62% | 10.47% | -7.91% | 26.64% | 9.50% | 29.87% | -2.10% |
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | 26.48% | 31.89% | 24.11% | 55.39% | -36.44% | 17.09% | 52.88% | 39.94% | -14.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGRO and AIQ is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2018 | 0.63 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DGRO and AIQ has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
DGRO vs. AIQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DGRO
AIQ
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
DGRO
AIQ
Financial Services
DGRO
AIQ
Healthcare
DGRO
AIQ
Consumer Defensive
DGRO
AIQ
-
Industrials
DGRO
AIQ
Utilities
DGRO
AIQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
DGRO
AIQ
Energy
DGRO
AIQ
-
Basic Materials
DGRO
AIQ
-
Communication Services
DGRO
AIQ
Real Estate
DGRO
-
AIQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGRO vs. AIQ — Risk / Return Rank
DGRO
AIQ
DGRO vs. AIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DGRO | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.36 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.58 | 3.28 | +0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.86 | 10.65 | +3.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DGRO vs. AIQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGRO drawdown since its inception was -35.10%, smaller than the maximum AIQ drawdown of -44.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRO and AIQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGRO | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.10% | -44.66% | +9.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.47% | -16.47% | +10.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.03% | -26.35% | +12.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.31% | -44.66% | +25.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.07% | -8.28% | +7.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.43% | -9.79% | +6.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.67% | 5.06% | -3.39% |
Volatility
DGRO vs. AIQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) is 2.68%, while Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) has a volatility of 13.58%. This indicates that DGRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGRO | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.68% | 13.58% | -10.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.00% | 21.73% | -14.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.57% | 25.69% | -16.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.84% | 25.83% | -11.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.63% | 25.75% | -9.12% |
DGRO vs. AIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGRO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than AIQ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
DGRO vs. AIQ - Dividend Comparison
DGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, more than AIQ's 0.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | 0.15% | 0.18% | 0.14% | 0.16% | 0.56% | 0.15% | 0.50% | 0.51% | 0.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.97% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DGRO and AIQ have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AIQ has higher volatility (13.58%) compared to DGRO (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRO dropped -35.10% vs AIQ's -44.66%.
On 5-year performance, AIQ leads with 17.07% vs 11.42% for DGRO. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AIQ has performed better with a 17.07% return vs 11.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for AIQ.
DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 0.15% for AIQ.
DGRO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while AIQ is Technology Equities. DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index, while AIQ tracks Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for DGRO and 0.68% for AIQ.
DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DGRO and AIQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer