DGRE vs. WTV
DGRE (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund) and WTV (WisdomTree US Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DGRE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while WTV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Value Index. DGRE is actively managed, while WTV is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DGRE returned 8.39%/yr vs 13.36%/yr for WTV. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DGRE charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for WTV.
Performance
DGRE vs. WTV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGRE achieves a 29.96% return, which is significantly higher than WTV's 11.47% return.
DGRE
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- 4.94%
- YTD
- 29.96%
- 6M
- 35.37%
- 1Y
- 55.03%
- 3Y*
- 23.90%
- 5Y*
- 8.39%
- 10Y*
- 9.47%
WTV
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 4.50%
- YTD
- 11.47%
- 6M
- 12.37%
- 1Y
- 25.21%
- 3Y*
- 22.93%
- 5Y*
- 13.36%
- 10Y*
- —
DGRE vs. WTV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRE WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 29.96% | 27.47% | 3.63% | 18.46% | -21.86% | 2.55% | 10.85% | 21.12% | -16.36% | 4.32% |
WTV WisdomTree US Value ETF | 11.47% | 13.51% | 23.99% | 22.35% | -8.06% | 30.59% | 6.15% | 29.69% | -8.29% | 1.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGRE and WTV is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2017 | 0.53 |
The correlation between DGRE and WTV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
DGRE vs. WTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DGRE
WTV
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Technology
DGRE
WTV
Financial Services
DGRE
WTV
Industrials
DGRE
WTV
Basic Materials
DGRE
WTV
Consumer Cyclical
DGRE
WTV
Healthcare
DGRE
WTV
Consumer Defensive
DGRE
WTV
Energy
DGRE
WTV
Utilities
DGRE
WTV
Communication Services
DGRE
WTV
Real Estate
DGRE
WTV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGRE vs. WTV — Risk / Return Rank
DGRE
WTV
DGRE vs. WTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE) and WisdomTree US Value ETF (WTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DGRE | WTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.38 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.04 | 3.54 | +0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.49 | 11.55 | +4.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DGRE | WTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.75 | 2.15 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.79 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.68 | -0.36 |
Drawdowns
DGRE vs. WTV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGRE drawdown since its inception was -36.95%, smaller than the maximum WTV drawdown of -42.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRE and WTV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGRE | WTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.95% | -42.18% | +5.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.68% | -7.15% | -6.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.65% | -18.49% | -2.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.82% | -19.30% | -15.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.96% | -0.11% | -1.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.00% | -5.05% | -6.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.35% | 2.19% | +1.16% |
Volatility
DGRE vs. WTV - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE) has a higher volatility of 8.78% compared to WisdomTree US Value ETF (WTV) at 3.01%. This indicates that DGRE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGRE | WTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.78% | 3.01% | +5.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.02% | 7.92% | +10.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.11% | 11.82% | +8.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.12% | 17.09% | +1.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.64% | 20.20% | -0.56% |
DGRE vs. WTV - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGRE has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than WTV's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
DGRE vs. WTV - Dividend Comparison
DGRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, less than WTV's 1.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRE WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 1.20% | 1.65% | 1.90% | 2.22% | 4.38% | 2.56% | 2.11% | 2.32% | 2.71% | 3.12% | 3.18% | 3.01% |
WTV WisdomTree US Value ETF | 1.64% | 1.59% | 1.54% | 1.62% | 2.08% | 1.55% | 1.63% | 1.44% | 1.94% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DGRE and WTV have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DGRE has higher volatility (8.78%) compared to WTV (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRE dropped -36.95% vs WTV's -42.18%.
On 5-year performance, WTV leads with 13.36% vs 8.39% for DGRE. On fees, WTV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, WTV has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, WTV has performed better with a 13.36% return vs 8.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
WTV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for DGRE.
WTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 1.20% for DGRE.
DGRE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while WTV is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for DGRE and 0.12% for WTV.
DGRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DGRE and WTV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer