DGRE vs. SRHQ

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

DGRE (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund) and SRHQ (SRH U.S. Quality ETF) are both Quality Factor funds. DGRE is actively managed, while SRHQ is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DGRE returned 19.58%/yr vs 17.26%/yr for SRHQ. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. DGRE charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SRHQ.

Performance

DGRE vs. SRHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE) and SRH U.S. Quality ETF (SRHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGRE achieves a 22.89% return, which is significantly higher than SRHQ's 20.78% return.

DGRE

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: -3.14%
• 6M: 14.70%
• YTD: 22.89%
• 1Y: 42.31%
• 3Y*: 19.58%
• 5Y*: 8.52%
• 10Y*: 8.22%
• ALL TIME*: 5.82%

SRHQ

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 1.86%
• 6M: 18.75%
• YTD: 20.78%
• 1Y: 31.30%
• 3Y*: 17.26%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 18.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DGRE WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund	$225.72K	$519.73K	$485.46K
SRHQ SRH U.S. Quality ETF	$113.47K	$63.13K	$30.03K

DGRE vs. SRHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
DGRE WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund	22.89%	27.47%	3.63%	18.46%	5.72%
SRHQ SRH U.S. Quality ETF	20.78%	7.34%	16.49%	21.81%	5.22%

Correlation

The correlation between DGRE and SRHQ is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.38
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2022	0.45

DGRE vs. SRHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DGRE	SRHQ
Technology	38.6%	21.9%
Financial Services	11.8%	10.2%
Industrials	8.0%	20.4%
Basic Materials	4.4%	2.7%
Healthcare	2.6%	21.4%
Consumer Cyclical	2.6%	11.3%
Consumer Defensive	2.3%	5.2%
Energy	1.1%	1.2%
Utilities	0.9%	1.2%
Communication Services	0.8%	2.1%
Real Estate	0.3%	1.2%

Return for Risk

DGRE vs. SRHQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DGRE

DGRE Risk / Return Rank: 77
DGRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
DGRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
DGRE Omega Ratio Rank: 77
DGRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
DGRE Martin Ratio Rank: 77

SRHQ

SRHQ Risk / Return Rank: 87
SRHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
SRHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
SRHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 80
SRHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
SRHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DGRE vs. SRHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE) and SRH U.S. Quality ETF (SRHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DGRE	SRHQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	1.97	-0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.32	2.80	-0.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.34	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.07	4.64	-1.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.68	16.85	-7.17

DGRE vs. SRHQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGRE Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the SRHQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRE and SRHQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DGRE vs. SRHQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRE drawdown since its inception was -36.95%, which is greater than SRHQ's maximum drawdown of -18.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRE and SRHQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	DGRE	SRHQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.95%	-18.50%	-18.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.68%	-6.31%	-7.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.65%	-18.50%	-2.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.43%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.95%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.16%	-1.47%	-7.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.93%	-2.98%	-8.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.33%	1.74%	+2.59%

Volatility

DGRE vs. SRHQ - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE) has a higher volatility of 8.92% compared to SRH U.S. Quality ETF (SRHQ) at 4.37%. This indicates that DGRE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SRHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DGRE	SRHQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.92%	4.37%	+4.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.64%	11.10%	+11.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.24%	14.90%	+9.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.08%	15.96%	+3.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.98%	15.96%	+4.02%

DGRE vs. SRHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGRE has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than SRHQ's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

DGRE vs. SRHQ - Dividend Comparison

DGRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, more than SRHQ's 0.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DGRE WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund	1.35%	1.65%	1.90%	2.22%	4.38%	2.56%	2.11%	2.32%	2.71%	3.12%	3.18%	3.01%
SRHQ SRH U.S. Quality ETF	0.69%	0.76%	0.66%	0.84%	0.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DGRE and SRHQ in my portfolio?

DGRE and SRHQ have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DGRE or SRHQ?

DGRE has higher volatility (8.92%) compared to SRHQ (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRE dropped -36.95% vs SRHQ's -18.50%.

Which ETF is better, DGRE or SRHQ?

On 3-year performance, DGRE leads with 19.58% vs 17.26% for SRHQ. On fees, DGRE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, SRHQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DGRE or SRHQ?

Over the 3-year period, DGRE has performed better with a 19.58% return vs 17.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DGRE or SRHQ?

DGRE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SRHQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DGRE or SRHQ?

DGRE has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 0.69% for SRHQ.

What is the main difference between DGRE and SRHQ?

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and SRH. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for DGRE and 0.35% for SRHQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SRHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.