DGRE vs. QARP
DGRE (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund) and QARP (Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF) are both Quality Factor funds. DGRE is actively managed, while QARP is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DGRE returned 8.52%/yr vs 11.83%/yr for QARP. Their 0.60 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. DGRE charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for QARP.
Performance
DGRE vs. QARP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGRE achieves a 22.89% return, which is significantly higher than QARP's 13.09% return.
DGRE
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -3.14%
- 6M
- 14.70%
- YTD
- 22.89%
- 1Y
- 42.31%
- 3Y*
- 19.58%
- 5Y*
- 8.52%
- 10Y*
- 8.22%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.82%
QARP
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- 6M
- 8.81%
- YTD
- 13.09%
- 1Y
- 25.79%
- 3Y*
- 16.68%
- 5Y*
- 11.83%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.16%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $225.72K | $519.73K | $485.46K | |
| $110.48K | $118.49K | $177.11K |
DGRE vs. QARP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRE WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 22.89% | 27.47% | 3.63% | 18.46% | -21.86% | 2.55% | 10.85% | 21.12% | -15.93% |
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 13.09% | 13.99% | 18.94% | 23.03% | -14.62% | 31.82% | 14.83% | 30.70% | -5.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGRE and QARP is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2018 | 0.60 |
The correlation between DGRE and QARP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
DGRE vs. QARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DGRE
QARP
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Technology
DGRE
QARP
Financial Services
DGRE
QARP
Industrials
DGRE
QARP
Basic Materials
DGRE
QARP
Healthcare
DGRE
QARP
Consumer Cyclical
DGRE
QARP
Consumer Defensive
DGRE
QARP
Energy
DGRE
QARP
Utilities
DGRE
QARP
Communication Services
DGRE
QARP
Real Estate
DGRE
QARP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGRE vs. QARP — Risk / Return Rank
DGRE
QARP
DGRE vs. QARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DGRE | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.41 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.07 | 3.37 | -0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.68 | 15.08 | -5.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DGRE vs. QARP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGRE drawdown since its inception was -36.95%, roughly equal to the maximum QARP drawdown of -35.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRE and QARP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGRE | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.95% | -35.44% | -1.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.68% | -7.26% | -6.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.65% | -15.65% | -5.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.43% | -22.75% | -10.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.16% | -0.14% | -9.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.93% | -4.37% | -7.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.33% | 1.62% | +2.71% |
Volatility
DGRE vs. QARP - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE) has a higher volatility of 8.92% compared to Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) at 2.59%. This indicates that DGRE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGRE | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.92% | 2.59% | +6.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.64% | 8.16% | +14.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.24% | 10.71% | +13.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.08% | 15.52% | +3.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.98% | 19.51% | +0.47% |
DGRE vs. QARP - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGRE has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than QARP's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
DGRE vs. QARP - Dividend Comparison
DGRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, more than QARP's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRE WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 1.35% | 1.65% | 1.90% | 2.22% | 4.38% | 2.56% | 2.11% | 2.32% | 2.71% | 3.12% | 3.18% | 3.01% |
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 1.02% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.28% | 1.68% | 1.34% | 1.61% | 1.85% | 1.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DGRE and QARP have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DGRE has higher volatility (8.92%) compared to QARP (2.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRE dropped -36.95% vs QARP's -35.44%.
On 5-year performance, QARP leads with 11.83% vs 8.52% for DGRE. On fees, QARP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, QARP has been the lower-risk option at 2.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QARP has performed better with a 11.83% return vs 8.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QARP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for DGRE.
DGRE has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 1.02% for QARP.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for DGRE and 0.19% for QARP.
QARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DGRE and QARP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer