DGRE vs. GDMN
DGRE (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund) and GDMN (WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - DGRE is a Quality Factor fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while GDMN is a Commodities fund actively managed by WisdomTree. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DGRE returned 21.92%/yr vs 61.31%/yr for GDMN. Their 0.41 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. DGRE charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for GDMN.
Performance
DGRE vs. GDMN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGRE achieves a 27.49% return, which is significantly higher than GDMN's -10.91% return.
DGRE
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -1.94%
- 6M
- 17.44%
- YTD
- 27.49%
- 1Y
- 46.05%
- 3Y*
- 21.92%
- 5Y*
- 8.99%
- 10Y*
- 8.31%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.12%
GDMN
- 1D
- 10.05%
- 1M
- 6.88%
- 6M
- -28.35%
- YTD
- -10.91%
- 1Y
- 56.56%
- 3Y*
- 61.31%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 34.66%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $227.85K | $419.81K | $483.14K | |
| $1.87M | $2.36M | $3.40M |
DGRE vs. GDMN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRE WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 27.49% | 27.47% | 3.63% | 18.46% | -21.86% | 2.16% |
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund | -10.91% | 237.09% | 28.23% | 12.97% | -14.62% | 6.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGRE and GDMN is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2021 | 0.41 |
DGRE vs. GDMN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DGRE
GDMN
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
DGRE
GDMN
-
Financial Services
DGRE
GDMN
-
Industrials
DGRE
GDMN
-
Basic Materials
DGRE
GDMN
Healthcare
DGRE
GDMN
-
Consumer Cyclical
DGRE
GDMN
-
Consumer Defensive
DGRE
GDMN
-
Energy
DGRE
GDMN
-
Utilities
DGRE
GDMN
-
Communication Services
DGRE
GDMN
-
Real Estate
DGRE
GDMN
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGRE vs. GDMN — Risk / Return Rank
DGRE
GDMN
DGRE vs. GDMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DGRE | GDMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.19 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.38 | 1.09 | +2.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.53 | 2.25 | +8.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DGRE vs. GDMN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGRE drawdown since its inception was -36.95%, smaller than the maximum GDMN drawdown of -52.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRE and GDMN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGRE | GDMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.95% | -52.82% | +15.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.68% | -52.02% | +38.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.65% | -52.02% | +31.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.76% | -41.52% | +35.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.92% | -19.89% | +7.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.39% | 25.26% | -20.87% |
Volatility
DGRE vs. GDMN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE) is 8.56%, while WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) has a volatility of 17.41%. This indicates that DGRE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGRE | GDMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.56% | 17.41% | -8.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.70% | 49.20% | -26.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.39% | 65.51% | -41.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.12% | 48.53% | -29.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.00% | 48.53% | -28.53% |
DGRE vs. GDMN - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGRE has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than GDMN's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
DGRE vs. GDMN - Dividend Comparison
DGRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than GDMN's 3.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRE WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 1.30% | 1.65% | 1.90% | 2.22% | 4.38% | 2.56% | 2.11% | 2.32% | 2.71% | 3.12% | 3.18% | 3.01% |
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund | 3.03% | 2.70% | 9.44% | 7.69% | 1.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DGRE and GDMN have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDMN has higher volatility (17.41%) compared to DGRE (8.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRE dropped -36.95% vs GDMN's -52.82%.
On 3-year performance, GDMN leads with 61.31% vs 21.92% for DGRE. On fees, DGRE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, DGRE has been the lower-risk option at 8.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GDMN has performed better with a 61.31% return vs 21.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGRE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GDMN.
GDMN has the higher dividend yield at 3.03%, compared with 1.30% for DGRE.
DGRE is categorized as Quality Factor, while GDMN is Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for DGRE and 0.45% for GDMN.
DGRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DGRE and GDMN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer