DGRE vs. EMOP
DGRE (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund) and EMOP (AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DGRE is a Quality Factor fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while EMOP is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DGRE returned 42.31% vs 38.67% for EMOP. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. DGRE charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for EMOP.
Performance
DGRE vs. EMOP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGRE achieves a 22.89% return, which is significantly higher than EMOP's 21.20% return.
DGRE
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -3.14%
- 6M
- 14.70%
- YTD
- 22.89%
- 1Y
- 42.31%
- 3Y*
- 19.58%
- 5Y*
- 8.52%
- 10Y*
- 8.22%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.82%
EMOP
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -3.09%
- 6M
- 9.87%
- YTD
- 21.20%
- 1Y
- 38.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 36.16%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $225.72K | $519.73K | $485.46K | |
| $2.89M | $2.64M | $4.99M |
DGRE vs. EMOP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DGRE WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 22.89% | 18.82% |
EMOP AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF | 21.20% | 16.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGRE and EMOP is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025 | 0.90 |
The correlation between DGRE and EMOP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
DGRE vs. EMOP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DGRE
EMOP
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Technology
DGRE
EMOP
Financial Services
DGRE
EMOP
Industrials
DGRE
EMOP
Basic Materials
DGRE
EMOP
Healthcare
DGRE
EMOP
Consumer Cyclical
DGRE
EMOP
Consumer Defensive
DGRE
EMOP
Energy
DGRE
EMOP
Utilities
DGRE
EMOP
Communication Services
DGRE
EMOP
Real Estate
DGRE
EMOP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGRE vs. EMOP — Risk / Return Rank
DGRE
EMOP
DGRE vs. EMOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE) and AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DGRE | EMOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.30 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.07 | 2.86 | +0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.68 | 8.90 | +0.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DGRE vs. EMOP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGRE drawdown since its inception was -36.95%, which is greater than EMOP's maximum drawdown of -13.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRE and EMOP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGRE | EMOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.95% | -13.05% | -23.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.68% | -13.05% | -0.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.16% | -9.28% | +0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.93% | -2.47% | -9.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.33% | 4.18% | +0.15% |
Volatility
DGRE vs. EMOP - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE) and AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP) have volatilities of 8.92% and 9.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGRE | EMOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.92% | 9.10% | -0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.64% | 21.10% | +1.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.24% | 23.30% | +0.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.08% | 22.38% | -3.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.98% | 22.38% | -2.40% |
DGRE vs. EMOP - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGRE has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than EMOP's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
DGRE vs. EMOP - Dividend Comparison
DGRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, more than EMOP's 1.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRE WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 1.35% | 1.65% | 1.90% | 2.22% | 4.38% | 2.56% | 2.11% | 2.32% | 2.71% | 3.12% | 3.18% | 3.01% |
EMOP AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF | 1.22% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, DGRE and EMOP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
EMOP has higher volatility (9.10%) compared to DGRE (8.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRE dropped -36.95% vs EMOP's -13.05%.
On 1-year performance, DGRE leads with 42.31% vs 38.67% for EMOP. On fees, DGRE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, DGRE has been the lower-risk option at 8.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DGRE has performed better with a 42.31% return vs 38.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGRE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for EMOP.
DGRE has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 1.22% for EMOP.
DGRE is categorized as Quality Factor, while EMOP is Emerging Markets Equities. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for DGRE and 0.70% for EMOP.
DGRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DGRE and EMOP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer