DGRC.TO vs. VUDV.TO
DGRC.TO (CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF) and VUDV.TO (Vanguard U.S. High Dividend Yield Index ETF) are both Dividend funds. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DGRC.TO charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for VUDV.TO.
Performance
DGRC.TO vs. VUDV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DGRC.TO
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- 3.28%
- YTD
- 15.78%
- 6M
- 15.70%
- 1Y
- 35.44%
- 3Y*
- 20.72%
- 5Y*
- 12.96%
- 10Y*
- —
VUDV.TO
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 4.45%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DGRC.TO vs. VUDV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DGRC.TO CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF | 7.33% |
VUDV.TO Vanguard U.S. High Dividend Yield Index ETF | 8.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGRC.TO and VUDV.TO is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2026 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGRC.TO vs. VUDV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
DGRC.TO
VUDV.TO
DGRC.TO vs. VUDV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF (DGRC.TO) and Vanguard U.S. High Dividend Yield Index ETF (VUDV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DGRC.TO | VUDV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.94 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.34 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DGRC.TO | VUDV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 7.49 | -6.66 |
Drawdowns
DGRC.TO vs. VUDV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGRC.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.59%, which is greater than VUDV.TO's maximum drawdown of -0.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRC.TO and VUDV.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGRC.TO | VUDV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.59% | -0.68% | -35.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.20% | -0.16% | -3.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.59% | — | — |
Volatility
DGRC.TO vs. VUDV.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGRC.TO | VUDV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.68% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.11% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.61% | 7.50% | +4.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.48% | 7.50% | +4.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.73% | 7.50% | +7.23% |
DGRC.TO vs. VUDV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGRC.TO has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than VUDV.TO's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
DGRC.TO vs. VUDV.TO - Dividend Comparison
DGRC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, while VUDV.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRC.TO CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF | 2.39% | 2.58% | 2.46% | 2.56% | 2.48% | 1.87% | 3.06% | 2.20% | 1.63% |
VUDV.TO Vanguard U.S. High Dividend Yield Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DGRC.TO and VUDV.TO have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DGRC.TO is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DGRC.TO is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for VUDV.TO.
They also come from different issuers: CI Investments and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for DGRC.TO and 0.28% for VUDV.TO.
Find the right allocation for DGRC.TO and VUDV.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer