VDIV.DE vs. ISPA.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (VDIV.DE) and iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE) (ISPA.DE).
VDIV.DE and ISPA.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VDIV.DE is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. It was launched on May 23, 2016. ISPA.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the STOXX® Global Select Dividend 100 index. It was launched on Sep 25, 2009. Both VDIV.DE and ISPA.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VDIV.DE or ISPA.DE.
Correlation
The correlation between VDIV.DE and ISPA.DE is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
VDIV.DE vs. ISPA.DE - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
VDIV.DE:
2.17
ISPA.DE:
1.89
VDIV.DE:
2.89
ISPA.DE:
2.52
VDIV.DE:
1.40
ISPA.DE:
1.34
VDIV.DE:
3.45
ISPA.DE:
2.88
VDIV.DE:
13.64
ISPA.DE:
11.30
VDIV.DE:
1.67%
ISPA.DE:
1.70%
VDIV.DE:
10.50%
ISPA.DE:
10.22%
VDIV.DE:
-35.90%
ISPA.DE:
-38.91%
VDIV.DE:
0.00%
ISPA.DE:
0.00%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VDIV.DE achieves a 7.52% return, which is significantly higher than ISPA.DE's 4.01% return.
VDIV.DE
7.52%
3.21%
12.63%
20.46%
12.30%
N/A
ISPA.DE
4.01%
1.76%
10.93%
18.88%
5.61%
5.69%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VDIV.DE vs. ISPA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
VDIV.DE has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than ISPA.DE's 0.46% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VDIV.DE vs. ISPA.DE — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
VDIV.DE
ISPA.DE
VDIV.DE vs. ISPA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (VDIV.DE) and iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE) (ISPA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VDIV.DE vs. ISPA.DE - Dividend Comparison
VDIV.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, less than ISPA.DE's 4.76% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VDIV.DE VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF | 2.39% | 2.57% | 4.97% | 4.56% | 3.97% | 4.11% | 4.35% | 0.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ISPA.DE iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE) | 4.76% | 4.89% | 5.91% | 4.87% | 3.32% | 4.04% | 4.02% | 3.37% | 5.66% | 3.64% | 4.35% | 3.36% |
Drawdowns
VDIV.DE vs. ISPA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VDIV.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.90%, smaller than the maximum ISPA.DE drawdown of -38.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDIV.DE and ISPA.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VDIV.DE vs. ISPA.DE - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (VDIV.DE) and iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE) (ISPA.DE) have volatilities of 2.58% and 2.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.