DGRC.TO vs. FXM.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DGRC.TO (CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF) and FXM.TO (CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DGRC.TO is a Dividend fund managed by CI Investments, while FXM.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Canada Target Value Index. Over the past 5 years, DGRC.TO returned 12.71%/yr vs 18.36%/yr for FXM.TO. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DGRC.TO charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for FXM.TO.

Performance

DGRC.TO vs. FXM.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF (DGRC.TO) and CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF (FXM.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGRC.TO achieves a 14.54% return, which is significantly lower than FXM.TO's 15.45% return.

DGRC.TO

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 2.95%
• YTD: 14.54%
• 6M: 14.94%
• 1Y: 32.94%
• 3Y*: 20.12%
• 5Y*: 12.71%
• 10Y*: —

FXM.TO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 4.99%
• YTD: 15.45%
• 6M: 18.22%
• 1Y: 48.87%
• 3Y*: 28.11%
• 5Y*: 18.36%
• 10Y*: 14.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGRC.TO vs. FXM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DGRC.TO CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF	14.54%	27.20%	12.36%	7.79%	-1.70%	20.84%	7.22%	18.60%	-3.85%
FXM.TO CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF	15.45%	38.54%	30.05%	5.79%	-1.19%	31.47%	6.15%	24.14%	-12.65%

Correlation

The correlation between DGRC.TO and FXM.TO is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2018	0.71

The correlation between DGRC.TO and FXM.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

DGRC.TO vs. FXM.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DGRC.TO	FXM.TO
Energy	27.7%	12.1%
Financial Services	24.3%	18.0%
Industrials	16.1%	7.1%
Consumer Defensive	10.7%	6.3%
Consumer Cyclical	10.2%	10.2%
Basic Materials	8.0%	15.4%
Communication Services	1.7%	12.0%
Technology	1.2%	5.7%
Real Estate	0.1%	-
Healthcare	-	-
Utilities	-	13.2%

Return for Risk

DGRC.TO vs. FXM.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGRC.TO

DGRC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 88
DGRC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
DGRC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
DGRC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 85
DGRC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
DGRC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 90

FXM.TO

FXM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 95
FXM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
FXM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
FXM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 97
FXM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
FXM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGRC.TO vs. FXM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF (DGRC.TO) and CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF (FXM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DGRC.TO	FXM.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.86	4.51	-1.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.88	5.74	-1.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.89	-0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.52	6.05	-0.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.77	24.09	-3.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DGRC.TO vs. FXM.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGRC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.86, which is lower than the FXM.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRC.TO and FXM.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DGRC.TO	FXM.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.86	4.51	-1.65
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.03	1.30	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.84	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.82	0.82	-0.01

Drawdowns

DGRC.TO vs. FXM.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRC.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.59%, smaller than the maximum FXM.TO drawdown of -46.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRC.TO and FXM.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	DGRC.TO	FXM.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.59%	-46.41%	+9.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.99%	-8.11%	+2.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.90%	-12.44%	-0.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.39%	-16.08%	+0.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-46.41%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.15%	0.00%	-0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.20%	-4.69%	+1.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.59%	2.03%	-0.44%

Volatility

DGRC.TO vs. FXM.TO - Volatility Comparison

CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF (DGRC.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.59% compared to CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF (FXM.TO) at 1.71%. This indicates that DGRC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DGRC.TO	FXM.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.59%	1.71%	+0.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.16%	8.36%	+0.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.58%	10.94%	+0.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.47%	14.25%	-1.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.73%	16.99%	-2.26%

DGRC.TO vs. FXM.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGRC.TO has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than FXM.TO's 0.64% expense ratio.

Dividends

DGRC.TO vs. FXM.TO - Dividend Comparison

DGRC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, more than FXM.TO's 1.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DGRC.TO CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF	2.41%	2.58%	2.46%	2.56%	2.48%	1.87%	3.06%	2.20%	1.63%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FXM.TO CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF	1.83%	1.91%	2.17%	2.96%	2.18%	2.19%	2.40%	2.03%	2.52%	1.70%	1.83%	2.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DGRC.TO and FXM.TO in my portfolio?

DGRC.TO and FXM.TO have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DGRC.TO or FXM.TO?

On fees, DGRC.TO is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DGRC.TO or FXM.TO?

DGRC.TO is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for FXM.TO.

What is the main difference between DGRC.TO and FXM.TO?

DGRC.TO is categorized as Dividend, while FXM.TO is Canada Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for DGRC.TO and 0.64% for FXM.TO.