DGLRX vs. FGIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about BNY Mellon Global Stock Fund (DGLRX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX).
DGLRX is managed by Dreyfus. It was launched on Dec 28, 2006. FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007.
Performance
DGLRX vs. FGIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DGLRX vs. FGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGLRX BNY Mellon Global Stock Fund | -5.04% | 8.59% | 17.14% | 21.48% | -19.14% | 17.63% | 19.50% | 29.57% | -1.69% | 24.22% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 10.36% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGLRX achieves a -5.04% return, which is significantly lower than FGIAX's 10.36% return. Over the past 10 years, DGLRX has outperformed FGIAX with an annualized return of 10.53%, while FGIAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.78% annualized return.
DGLRX
- 1D
- 2.45%
- 1M
- -5.53%
- YTD
- -5.04%
- 6M
- -4.79%
- 1Y
- 6.14%
- 3Y*
- 9.88%
- 5Y*
- 6.53%
- 10Y*
- 10.53%
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -2.77%
- YTD
- 10.36%
- 6M
- 10.94%
- 1Y
- 21.22%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.46%
- 10Y*
- 8.78%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DGLRX vs. FGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGLRX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than FGIAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DGLRX vs. FGIAX — Risk / Return Rank
DGLRX
FGIAX
DGLRX vs. FGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Global Stock Fund (DGLRX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DGLRX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.41 | 1.79 | -1.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.71 | 2.30 | -1.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.36 | -0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.61 | 2.73 | -2.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.18 | 12.62 | -10.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DGLRX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 | 1.79 | -1.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.80 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.58 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.42 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between DGLRX and FGIAX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DGLRX vs. FGIAX - Dividend Comparison
DGLRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 32.66%, more than FGIAX's 9.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGLRX BNY Mellon Global Stock Fund | 32.66% | 30.57% | 17.41% | 17.89% | 11.97% | 8.65% | 5.71% | 5.00% | 7.11% | 8.01% | 3.83% | 6.46% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.05% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
Drawdowns
DGLRX vs. FGIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGLRX drawdown since its inception was -43.83%, smaller than the maximum FGIAX drawdown of -49.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGLRX and FGIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGLRX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.83% | -49.35% | +5.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.27% | -8.29% | -2.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.20% | -21.08% | -8.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.20% | -38.02% | +8.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.75% | -3.06% | -5.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.97% | -7.22% | +1.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.17% | 1.79% | +1.38% |
Volatility
DGLRX vs. FGIAX - Volatility Comparison
BNY Mellon Global Stock Fund (DGLRX) has a higher volatility of 5.31% compared to Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) at 4.15%. This indicates that DGLRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DGLRX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.31% | 4.15% | +1.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.66% | 7.07% | +2.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.35% | 12.28% | +4.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.52% | 13.08% | +3.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.62% | 15.17% | +1.45% |