PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGLIX vs. GLIFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGLIX vs. GLIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Global Small Company Portfolio (DGLIX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGLIX achieves a 13.96% return, which is significantly higher than GLIFX's 8.80% return.


DGLIX

1D
0.05%
1M
2.62%
YTD
13.96%
6M
12.36%
1Y
27.85%
3Y*
17.10%
5Y*
8.29%
10Y*

GLIFX

1D
0.31%
1M
-0.73%
YTD
8.80%
6M
9.35%
1Y
16.72%
3Y*
14.87%
5Y*
11.63%
10Y*
10.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGLIX vs. GLIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGLIX
DFA Global Small Company Portfolio
13.96%15.76%8.86%16.71%-14.60%23.21%11.01%21.76%-15.96%16.09%
GLIFX
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares
8.80%23.85%6.71%10.89%-1.33%19.91%-4.51%22.27%-3.82%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between DGLIX and GLIFX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017

0.52

The correlation between DGLIX and GLIFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGLIX vs. GLIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGLIX
DGLIX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
DGLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
DGLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

GLIFX
GLIFX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
GLIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
GLIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGLIX vs. GLIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Global Small Company Portfolio (DGLIX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DGLIXGLIFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.31

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

1.99

+1.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.30

6.26

+5.04

DGLIX vs. GLIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGLIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the GLIFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGLIX and GLIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DGLIX vs. GLIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGLIX drawdown since its inception was -42.56%, which is greater than GLIFX's maximum drawdown of -29.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGLIX and GLIFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGLIXGLIFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.56%

-29.65%

-12.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.60%

-9.00%

-0.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.69%

-10.02%

-9.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.16%

-17.15%

-9.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

-4.49%

+4.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.37%

-3.36%

-4.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

2.86%

-0.29%

Volatility

DGLIX vs. GLIFX - Volatility Comparison

DFA Global Small Company Portfolio (DGLIX) has a higher volatility of 4.44% compared to Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX) at 2.62%. This indicates that DGLIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGLIXGLIFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.44%

2.62%

+1.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.81%

9.37%

+1.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.46%

10.81%

+3.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.00%

11.01%

+5.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.33%

13.31%

+5.02%

DGLIX vs. GLIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGLIX has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than GLIFX's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGLIX vs. GLIFX - Dividend Comparison

DGLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than GLIFX's 7.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGLIX
DFA Global Small Company Portfolio
1.45%1.66%2.69%2.56%1.27%3.63%1.33%1.46%1.10%0.58%0.00%0.00%
GLIFX
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares
7.22%6.22%4.26%2.95%14.81%6.21%2.59%4.44%14.29%6.94%1.91%11.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGLIX and GLIFX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGLIX has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to GLIFX (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGLIX dropped -42.56% vs GLIFX's -29.65%.

DGLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGLIX and GLIFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer