PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGFAX vs. UCEQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGFAX vs. UCEQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Davis Global Fund (DGFAX) and USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund (UCEQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGFAX achieves a 3.97% return, which is significantly lower than UCEQX's 14.50% return. Over the past 10 years, DGFAX has underperformed UCEQX with an annualized return of 11.01%, while UCEQX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.66% annualized return.


DGFAX

1D
0.52%
1M
4.38%
YTD
3.97%
6M
7.20%
1Y
25.38%
3Y*
21.59%
5Y*
6.45%
10Y*
11.01%

UCEQX

1D
0.26%
1M
6.13%
YTD
14.50%
6M
15.24%
1Y
31.69%
3Y*
21.67%
5Y*
11.30%
10Y*
11.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGFAX vs. UCEQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGFAX
Davis Global Fund
3.97%31.85%22.59%17.22%-16.53%-5.15%23.06%31.61%-20.73%33.33%
UCEQX
USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund
14.50%23.71%14.50%19.36%-16.25%19.68%10.76%22.49%-12.06%22.59%

Correlation

The correlation between DGFAX and UCEQX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2012

0.83

The correlation between DGFAX and UCEQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGFAX vs. UCEQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGFAX
DGFAX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
DGFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
DGFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

UCEQX
UCEQX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
UCEQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UCEQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
UCEQX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
UCEQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
UCEQX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGFAX vs. UCEQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Davis Global Fund (DGFAX) and USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund (UCEQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DGFAXUCEQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.48

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

3.61

-1.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.74

16.19

-9.45

DGFAX vs. UCEQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGFAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is lower than the UCEQX Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGFAX and UCEQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGFAXUCEQXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

2.64

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.74

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.71

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.70

-0.27

Drawdowns

DGFAX vs. UCEQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGFAX drawdown since its inception was -65.64%, which is greater than UCEQX's maximum drawdown of -35.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGFAX and UCEQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGFAXUCEQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.64%

-35.33%

-30.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.72%

-8.96%

-3.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.92%

-15.64%

-1.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.84%

-25.24%

-15.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.47%

-35.33%

-7.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.69%

-4.87%

-9.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.75%

1.99%

+1.76%

Volatility

DGFAX vs. UCEQX - Volatility Comparison

Davis Global Fund (DGFAX) has a higher volatility of 4.26% compared to USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund (UCEQX) at 3.67%. This indicates that DGFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UCEQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGFAXUCEQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.26%

3.67%

+0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.67%

9.71%

+0.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.35%

12.25%

+2.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.49%

15.27%

+5.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.98%

16.50%

+3.48%

DGFAX vs. UCEQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGFAX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than UCEQX's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGFAX vs. UCEQX - Dividend Comparison

DGFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.54%, more than UCEQX's 4.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGFAX
Davis Global Fund
7.54%7.83%13.06%1.07%0.00%11.55%0.27%1.88%9.25%0.00%0.00%6.12%
UCEQX
USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund
4.43%5.08%2.56%5.10%6.80%4.61%8.25%4.79%6.73%1.91%3.16%3.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGFAX and UCEQX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGFAX has higher volatility (4.26%) compared to UCEQX (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGFAX dropped -65.64% vs UCEQX's -35.33%.

UCEQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGFAX and UCEQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer