PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGCIX vs. LMLCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGCIX vs. LMLCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Delaware Corporate Bond Fund (DGCIX) and Western Asset SMASh Series C Fund (LMLCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGCIX achieves a 0.90% return, which is significantly lower than LMLCX's 1.82% return. Over the past 10 years, DGCIX has underperformed LMLCX with an annualized return of 3.03%, while LMLCX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.65% annualized return.


DGCIX

1D
0.07%
1M
1.08%
YTD
0.90%
6M
0.85%
1Y
6.24%
3Y*
5.20%
5Y*
0.17%
10Y*
3.03%

LMLCX

1D
0.22%
1M
1.85%
YTD
1.82%
6M
1.66%
1Y
11.29%
3Y*
6.50%
5Y*
4.57%
10Y*
4.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGCIX vs. LMLCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGCIX
Delaware Corporate Bond Fund
0.90%6.89%2.81%7.08%-16.87%-0.65%11.99%17.38%-3.78%7.91%
LMLCX
Western Asset SMASh Series C Fund
1.82%12.22%-2.21%12.93%-3.51%3.08%2.93%15.10%-4.24%7.20%

Correlation

The correlation between DGCIX and LMLCX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2012

0.55

Over the past year, DGCIX and LMLCX have become more correlated (0.92) than their long-term average of 0.55, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGCIX vs. LMLCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGCIX
DGCIX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
DGCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
DGCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

LMLCX
LMLCX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
LMLCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMLCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMLCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
LMLCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMLCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGCIX vs. LMLCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Delaware Corporate Bond Fund (DGCIX) and Western Asset SMASh Series C Fund (LMLCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DGCIXLMLCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.47

1.68

-0.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.18

2.52

-0.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.31

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

2.75

-0.86

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.47

9.40

-2.93

DGCIX vs. LMLCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGCIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the LMLCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGCIX and LMLCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGCIXLMLCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.47

1.68

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

0.59

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.65

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

0.78

+0.20

Drawdowns

DGCIX vs. LMLCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGCIX drawdown since its inception was -22.98%, roughly equal to the maximum LMLCX drawdown of -23.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGCIX and LMLCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGCIXLMLCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.98%

-23.45%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.42%

-4.22%

+0.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.37%

-11.77%

+5.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.98%

-11.77%

-11.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.98%

-23.45%

+0.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.81%

0.00%

-2.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.48%

-1.94%

-1.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

1.23%

-0.24%

Volatility

DGCIX vs. LMLCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Delaware Corporate Bond Fund (DGCIX) is 1.50%, while Western Asset SMASh Series C Fund (LMLCX) has a volatility of 2.07%. This indicates that DGCIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LMLCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGCIXLMLCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.50%

2.07%

-0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.26%

4.47%

-1.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.39%

6.91%

-2.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.47%

7.79%

-1.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.03%

7.19%

-1.16%

DGCIX vs. LMLCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGCIX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than LMLCX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGCIX vs. LMLCX - Dividend Comparison

DGCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.10%, less than LMLCX's 6.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGCIX
Delaware Corporate Bond Fund
5.10%5.06%4.84%3.78%3.81%4.56%3.72%4.54%4.18%4.11%3.63%4.17%
LMLCX
Western Asset SMASh Series C Fund
6.18%6.11%6.58%5.78%4.46%5.42%3.54%4.16%5.59%4.04%3.75%5.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, DGCIX and LMLCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

LMLCX has higher volatility (2.07%) compared to DGCIX (1.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGCIX dropped -22.98% vs LMLCX's -23.45%.

LMLCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGCIX and LMLCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer