DGCB vs. DFSV

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Dimensional Global Credit ETF (DGCB) and Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF (DFSV).

DGCB and DFSV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DGCB is an actively managed fund by Dimensional. It was launched on Nov 7, 2023. DFSV is an actively managed fund by Dimensional. It was launched on Feb 23, 2022.

Performance

DGCB vs. DFSV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Global Credit ETF (DGCB) and Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF (DFSV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DGCB vs. DFSV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DGCB Dimensional Global Credit ETF	-0.19%	6.68%	3.80%	6.14%
DFSV Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF	6.90%	8.59%	7.13%	18.61%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGCB achieves a -0.19% return, which is significantly lower than DFSV's 6.90% return.

DGCB

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: -2.04%
• YTD: -0.19%
• 6M: 0.41%
• 1Y: 4.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DFSV

• 1D: 1.98%
• 1M: -3.01%
• YTD: 6.90%
• 6M: 10.89%
• 1Y: 26.57%
• 3Y*: 13.70%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGCB vs. DFSV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGCB has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DFSV's 0.31% expense ratio.

DFSV

Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF

DGCB

Dimensional Global Credit ETF

Return for Risk

DGCB vs. DFSV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGCB

DGCB Risk / Return Rank: 57
DGCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
DGCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
DGCB Omega Ratio Rank: 51
DGCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
DGCB Martin Ratio Rank: 57

DFSV

DFSV Risk / Return Rank: 68
DFSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
DFSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
DFSV Omega Ratio Rank: 66
DFSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
DFSV Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGCB vs. DFSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Global Credit ETF (DGCB) and Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF (DFSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DGCB	DFSV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.06	1.12	-0.06
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.48	1.67	-0.19
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.23	-0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.60	1.73	-0.14
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.56	6.49	-0.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DGCB vs. DFSV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGCB Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is comparable to the DFSV Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGCB and DFSV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DGCB	DFSV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.06	1.12	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.45	0.46	+0.99

Correlation

The correlation between DGCB and DFSV is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

DGCB vs. DFSV - Dividend Comparison

DGCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, more than DFSV's 1.53% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
DGCB Dimensional Global Credit ETF	2.85%	3.43%	4.72%	0.63%	0.00%
DFSV Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF	1.53%	1.53%	1.31%	1.29%	0.90%

Drawdowns

DGCB vs. DFSV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGCB drawdown since its inception was -3.50%, smaller than the maximum DFSV drawdown of -28.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGCB and DFSV.

Drawdown Indicators

	DGCB	DFSV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.50%	-28.02%	+24.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.08%	-15.38%	+12.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.04%	-5.67%	+3.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.77%	-6.93%	+6.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.88%	4.11%	-3.23%

Volatility

DGCB vs. DFSV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional Global Credit ETF (DGCB) is 2.15%, while Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF (DFSV) has a volatility of 5.36%. This indicates that DGCB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFSV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DGCB	DFSV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.15%	5.36%	-3.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.72%	13.02%	-10.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.49%	23.83%	-19.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.82%	22.56%	-17.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.82%	22.56%	-17.74%