PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGBEX vs. MDGCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGBEX vs. MDGCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Global Social Core Equity Portfolio (DGBEX) and BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. (MDGCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGBEX achieves a 14.80% return, which is significantly lower than MDGCX's 19.80% return.


DGBEX

1D
0.55%
1M
6.16%
YTD
14.80%
6M
16.17%
1Y
32.78%
3Y*
22.08%
5Y*
11.45%
10Y*

MDGCX

1D
0.70%
1M
7.14%
YTD
19.80%
6M
21.05%
1Y
40.27%
3Y*
22.15%
5Y*
11.84%
10Y*
12.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGBEX vs. MDGCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DGBEX
DFA Global Social Core Equity Portfolio
14.80%22.39%15.72%22.33%-17.76%20.94%12.88%3.93%
MDGCX
BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc.
19.80%23.61%10.87%22.43%-17.94%17.52%15.61%4.08%

Correlation

The correlation between DGBEX and MDGCX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2019

0.95

The correlation between DGBEX and MDGCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGBEX vs. MDGCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGBEX
DGBEX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
DGBEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGBEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGBEX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
DGBEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGBEX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

MDGCX
MDGCX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
MDGCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDGCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDGCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
MDGCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDGCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGBEX vs. MDGCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Global Social Core Equity Portfolio (DGBEX) and BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. (MDGCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DGBEXMDGCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.59

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

5.05

-1.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.25

23.35

-9.11

DGBEX vs. MDGCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGBEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the MDGCX Sharpe Ratio of 3.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGBEX and MDGCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGBEXMDGCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

3.24

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.74

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.66

+0.05

Drawdowns

DGBEX vs. MDGCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGBEX drawdown since its inception was -37.83%, smaller than the maximum MDGCX drawdown of -48.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGBEX and MDGCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGBEXMDGCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.83%

-48.25%

+10.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.32%

-8.07%

-2.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.44%

-21.46%

+4.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.97%

-26.68%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.22%

-9.93%

+3.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.35%

1.74%

+0.61%

Volatility

DGBEX vs. MDGCX - Volatility Comparison

DFA Global Social Core Equity Portfolio (DGBEX) has a higher volatility of 3.97% compared to BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. (MDGCX) at 3.75%. This indicates that DGBEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDGCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGBEXMDGCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.97%

3.75%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.47%

10.02%

+0.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.96%

12.57%

+0.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.34%

16.15%

+0.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.38%

17.25%

+2.13%

DGBEX vs. MDGCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGBEX has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than MDGCX's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGBEX vs. MDGCX - Dividend Comparison

DGBEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, less than MDGCX's 7.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGBEX
DFA Global Social Core Equity Portfolio
1.44%1.50%2.73%1.85%1.79%2.81%2.24%0.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MDGCX
BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc.
7.44%8.91%7.78%1.42%1.75%16.75%3.77%1.73%4.06%34.82%0.65%5.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, DGBEX and MDGCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DGBEX has higher volatility (3.97%) compared to MDGCX (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGBEX dropped -37.83% vs MDGCX's -48.25%.

MDGCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 2.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGBEX and MDGCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer