DGBEX vs. MDGCX
DGBEX (DFA Global Social Core Equity Portfolio) and MDGCX (BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc.) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, DGBEX returned 11.45%/yr vs 11.84%/yr for MDGCX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DGBEX charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for MDGCX.
Performance
DGBEX vs. MDGCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGBEX achieves a 14.80% return, which is significantly lower than MDGCX's 19.80% return.
DGBEX
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 6.16%
- YTD
- 14.80%
- 6M
- 16.17%
- 1Y
- 32.78%
- 3Y*
- 22.08%
- 5Y*
- 11.45%
- 10Y*
- —
MDGCX
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 7.14%
- YTD
- 19.80%
- 6M
- 21.05%
- 1Y
- 40.27%
- 3Y*
- 22.15%
- 5Y*
- 11.84%
- 10Y*
- 12.56%
DGBEX vs. MDGCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGBEX DFA Global Social Core Equity Portfolio | 14.80% | 22.39% | 15.72% | 22.33% | -17.76% | 20.94% | 12.88% | 3.93% |
MDGCX BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. | 19.80% | 23.61% | 10.87% | 22.43% | -17.94% | 17.52% | 15.61% | 4.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGBEX and MDGCX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2019 | 0.95 |
The correlation between DGBEX and MDGCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGBEX vs. MDGCX — Risk / Return Rank
DGBEX
MDGCX
DGBEX vs. MDGCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Global Social Core Equity Portfolio (DGBEX) and BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. (MDGCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DGBEX | MDGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.59 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.27 | 5.05 | -1.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.25 | 23.35 | -9.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DGBEX | MDGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.61 | 3.24 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.74 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.66 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
DGBEX vs. MDGCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGBEX drawdown since its inception was -37.83%, smaller than the maximum MDGCX drawdown of -48.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGBEX and MDGCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGBEX | MDGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.83% | -48.25% | +10.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.32% | -8.07% | -2.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.44% | -21.46% | +4.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.97% | -26.68% | -0.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.22% | -9.93% | +3.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.35% | 1.74% | +0.61% |
Volatility
DGBEX vs. MDGCX - Volatility Comparison
DFA Global Social Core Equity Portfolio (DGBEX) has a higher volatility of 3.97% compared to BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. (MDGCX) at 3.75%. This indicates that DGBEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDGCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGBEX | MDGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.97% | 3.75% | +0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.47% | 10.02% | +0.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.96% | 12.57% | +0.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.34% | 16.15% | +0.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.38% | 17.25% | +2.13% |
DGBEX vs. MDGCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGBEX has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than MDGCX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
DGBEX vs. MDGCX - Dividend Comparison
DGBEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, less than MDGCX's 7.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGBEX DFA Global Social Core Equity Portfolio | 1.44% | 1.50% | 2.73% | 1.85% | 1.79% | 2.81% | 2.24% | 0.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MDGCX BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. | 7.44% | 8.91% | 7.78% | 1.42% | 1.75% | 16.75% | 3.77% | 1.73% | 4.06% | 34.82% | 0.65% | 5.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, DGBEX and MDGCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DGBEX has higher volatility (3.97%) compared to MDGCX (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGBEX dropped -37.83% vs MDGCX's -48.25%.
MDGCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 2.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DGBEX and MDGCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer