DFVX vs. WNTR

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

DFVX (Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF) and WNTR (YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFVX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while WNTR is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DFVX returned 20.96% vs 97.02% for WNTR. At a correlation of -0.41, they often move in opposite directions. DFVX charges 0.22%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for WNTR.

Performance

DFVX vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF (DFVX) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFVX achieves a 9.78% return, which is significantly lower than WNTR's 10.46% return.

DFVX

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: -0.49%
• YTD: 9.78%
• 6M: 8.51%
• 1Y: 20.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WNTR

• 1D: 6.01%
• 1M: 37.47%
• YTD: 10.46%
• 6M: 14.06%
• 1Y: 97.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFVX vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DFVX Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF	9.78%	15.11%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	10.46%	52.78%

Correlation

The correlation between DFVX and WNTR is -0.38, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025	-0.41

Return for Risk

DFVX vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFVX

DFVX Risk / Return Rank: 67
DFVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
DFVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
DFVX Omega Ratio Rank: 64
DFVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
DFVX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

WNTR

WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 51
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 52
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFVX vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF (DFVX) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DFVX	WNTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.89	1.85	+0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.63	2.20	+0.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.30	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.93	2.29	+0.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.52	5.85	+6.67

DFVX vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFVX and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DFVX vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFVX drawdown since its inception was -16.71%, smaller than the maximum WNTR drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFVX and WNTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFVX	WNTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.71%	-42.65%	+25.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.17%	-42.65%	+35.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.18%	-9.88%	+7.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.78%	-20.93%	+19.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.68%	16.70%	-15.02%

Volatility

DFVX vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF (DFVX) is 3.86%, while YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 17.54%. This indicates that DFVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFVX	WNTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.86%	17.54%	-13.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.62%	45.99%	-37.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.19%	52.83%	-41.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.71%	53.10%	-39.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.71%	53.10%	-39.39%

DFVX vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFVX has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFVX vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

DFVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than WNTR's 96.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
DFVX Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF	1.18%	1.21%	1.22%	0.32%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	96.66%	58.56%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFVX and WNTR in my portfolio?

DFVX and WNTR have a correlation of -0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DFVX or WNTR?

WNTR has higher volatility (17.54%) compared to DFVX (3.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFVX dropped -16.71% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

Which ETF is better, DFVX or WNTR?

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 97.02% vs 20.96% for DFVX. On fees, DFVX is cheaper at 0.22% per year. On volatility, DFVX has been the lower-risk option at 3.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DFVX or WNTR?

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 97.02% return vs 20.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DFVX or WNTR?

DFVX is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DFVX or WNTR?

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 96.66%, compared with 1.18% for DFVX.

What is the main difference between DFVX and WNTR?

DFVX is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for DFVX and 1.01% for WNTR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.