DFVX vs. QMOM
DFVX (Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF) and QMOM (Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFVX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while QMOM is a Momentum fund actively managed by Alpha Architect. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DFVX returned 26.10% vs 32.33% for QMOM. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFVX charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for QMOM.
Performance
DFVX vs. QMOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFVX achieves a 11.47% return, which is significantly lower than QMOM's 25.11% return.
DFVX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 3.03%
- YTD
- 11.47%
- 6M
- 12.46%
- 1Y
- 26.10%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QMOM
- 1D
- 1.78%
- 1M
- 6.76%
- YTD
- 25.11%
- 6M
- 27.55%
- 1Y
- 32.33%
- 3Y*
- 23.37%
- 5Y*
- 11.72%
- 10Y*
- 13.86%
DFVX vs. QMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DFVX Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF | 11.47% | 15.35% | 17.72% | 9.85% |
QMOM Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF | 25.11% | 2.36% | 30.43% | 16.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFVX and QMOM is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2023 | 0.74 |
The correlation between DFVX and QMOM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
DFVX vs. QMOM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFVX
QMOM
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
DFVX
QMOM
Communication Services
DFVX
QMOM
Industrials
DFVX
QMOM
Financial Services
DFVX
QMOM
Consumer Cyclical
DFVX
QMOM
Healthcare
DFVX
QMOM
Energy
DFVX
QMOM
Consumer Defensive
DFVX
QMOM
Basic Materials
DFVX
QMOM
Utilities
DFVX
QMOM
Real Estate
DFVX
QMOM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFVX vs. QMOM — Risk / Return Rank
DFVX
QMOM
DFVX vs. QMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF (DFVX) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFVX | QMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.43 | 1.39 | +1.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.41 | 1.95 | +1.47 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.25 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | 2.63 | +1.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.19 | 9.61 | +6.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFVX | QMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | 1.39 | +1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.61 | 0.52 | +1.09 |
Drawdowns
DFVX vs. QMOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFVX drawdown since its inception was -16.71%, smaller than the maximum QMOM drawdown of -39.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFVX and QMOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFVX | QMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.71% | -39.13% | +22.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.17% | -12.65% | +5.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.08% | 0.00% | -0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.79% | -12.92% | +11.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.64% | 3.45% | -1.81% |
Volatility
DFVX vs. QMOM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF (DFVX) is 2.49%, while Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM) has a volatility of 8.29%. This indicates that DFVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QMOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFVX | QMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.49% | 8.29% | -5.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.04% | 19.87% | -11.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.77% | 23.30% | -12.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.67% | 24.20% | -10.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.67% | 26.49% | -12.82% |
DFVX vs. QMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFVX has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than QMOM's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFVX vs. QMOM - Dividend Comparison
DFVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, more than QMOM's 0.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFVX Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF | 1.17% | 1.21% | 1.22% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QMOM Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF | 0.43% | 0.54% | 1.40% | 0.87% | 1.59% | 0.12% | 0.08% | 0.01% | 0.05% | 0.13% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFVX and QMOM have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QMOM has higher volatility (8.29%) compared to DFVX (2.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFVX dropped -16.71% vs QMOM's -39.13%.
On 1-year performance, QMOM leads with 32.33% vs 26.10% for DFVX. On fees, DFVX is cheaper at 0.22% per year. On volatility, DFVX has been the lower-risk option at 2.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QMOM has performed better with a 32.33% return vs 26.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFVX is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for QMOM.
DFVX has the higher dividend yield at 1.17%, compared with 0.43% for QMOM.
DFVX is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while QMOM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for DFVX and 0.28% for QMOM.
DFVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFVX and QMOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer