PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFVX vs. JHDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFVX vs. JHDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF (DFVX) and John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF (JHDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFVX achieves a 9.66% return, which is significantly lower than JHDV's 17.56% return.


DFVX

1D
-1.12%
1M
-0.60%
YTD
9.66%
6M
8.81%
1Y
22.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JHDV

1D
-1.41%
1M
1.19%
YTD
17.56%
6M
16.88%
1Y
30.01%
3Y*
21.41%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFVX vs. JHDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DFVX
Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF
9.66%15.35%17.72%10.84%
JHDV
John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF
17.56%14.76%20.25%12.91%

Correlation

The correlation between DFVX and JHDV is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2023

0.90

The correlation between DFVX and JHDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFVX vs. JHDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFVX
DFVX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
DFVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
DFVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

JHDV
JHDV Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
JHDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
JHDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHDV Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFVX vs. JHDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF (DFVX) and John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF (JHDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFVXJHDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.44

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

3.65

-0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.19

14.91

-1.72

DFVX vs. JHDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the JHDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFVX and JHDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFVX vs. JHDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFVX drawdown since its inception was -16.71%, smaller than the maximum JHDV drawdown of -18.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFVX and JHDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFVXJHDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.71%

-18.97%

+2.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.17%

-8.26%

+1.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.29%

-2.03%

-0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.78%

-2.61%

+0.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

2.02%

-0.35%

Volatility

DFVX vs. JHDV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF (DFVX) is 3.99%, while John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF (JHDV) has a volatility of 4.43%. This indicates that DFVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JHDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFVXJHDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.99%

4.43%

-0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.67%

9.60%

-0.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.23%

12.20%

-0.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.73%

15.71%

-1.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.73%

15.71%

-1.98%

DFVX vs. JHDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFVX has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than JHDV's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFVX vs. JHDV - Dividend Comparison

DFVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than JHDV's 2.01% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
DFVX
Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF
1.18%1.21%1.22%0.32%0.00%
JHDV
John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF
2.01%2.40%2.50%2.77%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFVX and JHDV have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JHDV has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to DFVX (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFVX dropped -16.71% vs JHDV's -18.97%.

On 1-year performance, JHDV leads with 30.01% vs 22.03% for DFVX. On fees, DFVX is cheaper at 0.22% per year. On volatility, DFVX has been the lower-risk option at 3.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JHDV has performed better with a 30.01% return vs 22.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFVX is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for JHDV.

JHDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.01%, compared with 1.18% for DFVX.

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and John Hancock. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for DFVX and 0.34% for JHDV.

JHDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFVX and JHDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer