DFVX vs. FUNL

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

DFVX (Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF) and FUNL (CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DFVX returned 26.10% vs 20.00% for FUNL. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DFVX charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for FUNL.

Performance

DFVX vs. FUNL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF (DFVX) and CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFVX achieves a 11.47% return, which is significantly higher than FUNL's 5.66% return.

DFVX

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 3.03%
• YTD: 11.47%
• 6M: 12.46%
• 1Y: 26.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FUNL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 5.66%
• 6M: 7.88%
• 1Y: 20.00%
• 3Y*: 16.53%
• 5Y*: 9.54%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFVX vs. FUNL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DFVX Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF	11.47%	15.35%	17.72%	9.85%
FUNL CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL	5.66%	14.62%	15.55%	13.35%

Correlation

The correlation between DFVX and FUNL is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2023	0.86

The correlation between DFVX and FUNL shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DFVX vs. FUNL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DFVX	FUNL
Technology	19.8%	14.6%
Communication Services	14.3%	5.8%
Industrials	14.2%	11.5%
Financial Services	11.9%	19.3%
Consumer Cyclical	11.4%	6.5%
Healthcare	10.0%	15.3%
Energy	7.4%	7.6%
Consumer Defensive	7.1%	7.0%
Basic Materials	3.2%	2.2%
Utilities	0.4%	5.0%
Real Estate	0.1%	4.5%

Return for Risk

DFVX vs. FUNL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFVX

DFVX Risk / Return Rank: 75
DFVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
DFVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
DFVX Omega Ratio Rank: 72
DFVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
DFVX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

FUNL

FUNL Risk / Return Rank: 81
FUNL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
FUNL Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
FUNL Omega Ratio Rank: 81
FUNL Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FUNL Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFVX vs. FUNL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF (DFVX) and CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DFVX	FUNL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.43	2.30	+0.14
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.41	3.41	0.00
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.49	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.70	5.42	-1.72
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.19	25.33	-9.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DFVX vs. FUNL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the FUNL Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFVX and FUNL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DFVX	FUNL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.43	2.30	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.63	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.61	0.95	+0.66

Drawdowns

DFVX vs. FUNL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFVX drawdown since its inception was -16.71%, smaller than the maximum FUNL drawdown of -19.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFVX and FUNL.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFVX	FUNL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.71%	-19.35%	+2.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.17%	-3.83%	-3.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.37%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.08%	-0.12%	+0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.79%	-3.54%	+1.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.64%	0.82%	+0.82%

Volatility

DFVX vs. FUNL - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF (DFVX) has a higher volatility of 2.49% compared to CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL) at 0.00%. This indicates that DFVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUNL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFVX	FUNL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.49%	0.00%	+2.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.04%	5.25%	+2.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.77%	8.82%	+1.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.67%	15.16%	-1.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.67%	15.30%	-1.63%

DFVX vs. FUNL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFVX has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than FUNL's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFVX vs. FUNL - Dividend Comparison

DFVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than FUNL's 2.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DFVX Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF	1.17%	1.21%	1.22%	0.32%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FUNL CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL	2.25%	2.10%	1.78%	1.69%	1.84%	1.55%	0.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFVX and FUNL in my portfolio?

DFVX and FUNL have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DFVX or FUNL?

DFVX has higher volatility (2.49%) compared to FUNL (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFVX dropped -16.71% vs FUNL's -19.35%.

Which ETF is better, DFVX or FUNL?

On 1-year performance, DFVX leads with 26.10% vs 20.00% for FUNL. On fees, DFVX is cheaper at 0.22% per year. On volatility, FUNL has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DFVX or FUNL?

Over the 1-year period, DFVX has performed better with a 26.10% return vs 20.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DFVX or FUNL?

DFVX is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FUNL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DFVX or FUNL?

FUNL has the higher dividend yield at 2.25%, compared with 1.17% for DFVX.

What is the main difference between DFVX and FUNL?

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and CornerCap. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for DFVX and 0.50% for FUNL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.