PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFUVX vs. FBLEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFUVX vs. FBLEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA U.S. Large Cap Value III Portfolio (DFUVX) and Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFUVX achieves a 16.05% return, which is significantly higher than FBLEX's 8.36% return. Over the past 10 years, DFUVX has underperformed FBLEX with an annualized return of 11.31%, while FBLEX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.89% annualized return.


DFUVX

1D
1.09%
1M
5.72%
YTD
16.05%
6M
17.74%
1Y
33.87%
3Y*
19.28%
5Y*
9.66%
10Y*
11.31%

FBLEX

1D
0.33%
1M
2.07%
YTD
8.36%
6M
9.82%
1Y
22.33%
3Y*
19.15%
5Y*
11.55%
10Y*
11.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFUVX vs. FBLEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFUVX
DFA U.S. Large Cap Value III Portfolio
16.05%15.83%12.87%11.65%-5.73%22.75%-0.45%25.62%-11.58%18.60%
FBLEX
Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund
8.36%17.06%18.04%15.60%-4.82%26.83%4.34%25.57%-9.04%12.38%

Correlation

The correlation between DFUVX and FBLEX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2012

0.96

The correlation between DFUVX and FBLEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFUVX vs. FBLEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFUVX
DFUVX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
DFUVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFUVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFUVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
DFUVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFUVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

FBLEX
FBLEX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FBLEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBLEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBLEX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
FBLEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBLEX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFUVX vs. FBLEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA U.S. Large Cap Value III Portfolio (DFUVX) and Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFUVXFBLEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.40

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.05

3.35

+2.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.16

13.56

+8.60

DFUVX vs. FBLEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFUVX Sharpe Ratio is 3.20, which is higher than the FBLEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFUVX and FBLEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFUVXFBLEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.20

2.20

+1.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.78

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.69

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.73

-0.28

Drawdowns

DFUVX vs. FBLEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFUVX drawdown since its inception was -65.60%, which is greater than FBLEX's maximum drawdown of -39.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFUVX and FBLEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFUVXFBLEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.60%

-39.73%

-25.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.85%

-6.89%

+1.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.04%

-14.71%

-2.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.33%

-19.00%

-1.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.76%

-39.73%

-2.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.20%

+0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.84%

-3.83%

-6.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

1.70%

-0.11%

Volatility

DFUVX vs. FBLEX - Volatility Comparison

DFA U.S. Large Cap Value III Portfolio (DFUVX) has a higher volatility of 2.87% compared to Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX) at 2.69%. This indicates that DFUVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBLEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFUVXFBLEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

2.69%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.22%

7.89%

+0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.05%

10.50%

+0.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.93%

14.79%

+1.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.40%

17.40%

+1.00%

DFUVX vs. FBLEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFUVX has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than FBLEX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFUVX vs. FBLEX - Dividend Comparison

DFUVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, less than FBLEX's 10.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFUVX
DFA U.S. Large Cap Value III Portfolio
1.50%1.31%1.94%5.68%5.84%1.77%2.09%5.04%9.79%7.99%4.90%8.03%
FBLEX
Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund
10.25%9.95%12.63%5.05%12.66%14.51%3.85%5.65%10.97%7.09%2.47%13.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, DFUVX and FBLEX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DFUVX has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to FBLEX (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFUVX dropped -65.60% vs FBLEX's -39.73%.

DFUVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.20 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFUVX and FBLEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer